19934 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
you must get fed up with all the lemons that post that they have just scored 100% in a puzzle...
If you are properly looking at a puzzle, looking at various alternatives, then a score of around 80% is what you should expect..
100% and you are just guessing...
Saying that...if you have posted that you got 100% then let's here why???
I've found that people invariably post "easy" on all the problems that I fail, and only the ones that I fail.
I got a score of 100% on this problem (although I did not post my score in the comments of the problem) because I have seen this position numerous times before, including just a few days ago. The solution came to me instantly, so I was able to solve it in seven seconds--well below the average time of 34 seconds.
On the other hand, I needed almost eight minutes to solve another problem that had an average solving time of one minute, 33 seconds.
Sometimes, everything falls into place.
Yeah that's a very well known 'bad resign' position.
Ok.. whirlwind....a moment of clarity...yes...but I'm guessing you didn't get 100%....'I scored 100% whooooohoooo'....these are the muppets that 'get my goat'...
I guess I shouldn't...
I should just enjoy their joy but.....I don't...
I just think...'shut up you muppet'
Yes....maybe thats it...
"100% and you are just guessing.." Look, I don't post on TT and of course I'm annoyed with the many idiot postings like "easy" that I come across, but that statement is just wrong. Are there people who guess their way to a 100% score? Sure, but the whole rationale behind timed puzzles is that the TT is about "pattern recognition" and the 100%'s I've had (few and far between) have been because I recognized the pattern. There are other TT's on the web that are primarily about calculation, but this one is not. For a far more informed opinion on the necessity of "pattern training" check out Coach Heisman's website (danheisman.com). Coach believes very strongly that you should know and recognize several thousand patterns as easily as you do multiplication tables. I'm like you, most of the time I have to calculate through the problem, but not always. Sometimes I see a problem whose answer is as clear, immediate, and obvious as 6x7=42.
Yeah that comment was just wrong. I went 50-0 on TT last week, maybe a third or so were 100%. It was hardly guessing.
Sure, people do play moves without seeing the combination through, but it's also possible to be absolutely sure and still get 100%.
Apart from mate-in-ones which 'you just see' then every other type of puzzle needs more than a few seconds (100% score) to be sure you have the right answer...
Not if you recognise the pattern. Bodens mate, Anastasias mate, a lot of these are 2 second puzzles if you know them well enough.
Also, I've seen puzzles where you can still get 100% after 30 seconds.
Ok..big guy...love your avatar btw...
Don't puzzles become harder, the better you get so you don't just see the same patterns over again? You are at about 1700 so that means those nice little bodens and anastasias mates are a thing of the past...right?
I remember one problem I solved several weeks ago, similar to what Scottrf described. I took about 22 seconds, and because the average solving time was so high (maybe about five or seven minutes--I don't remember exactly) I still got 100%. I had thought that I had taken a long time, too, and wouldn't ordinarily have deserved 100%.
My rating is new, I don't really know what puzzles are shown at this level (was ~2200 for the most part). I don't normally see many though, no, but a lot of easy tactics form composite parts of difficult tactics. And you will still recognise some instantly, this one for example there are so many variation of on there it's just recognition not calculation:
Yeah I got it right away and recall seeing it before I didn't recall the exact moves just the general idea which makes finding the moves pretty easy when there are so few possible moves in the position
Oh, and easy peasy!
Thoughts on people who illegally download chess books?
by Esteban_Garcia 5 minutes ago
by david 9 minutes ago
why do they call the rooks a pig?
by doctorpsb 10 minutes ago
Express if you like or do not like the new version of the site
by JFK-Ramsey 10 minutes ago
difference between a beginner and a master
by lwk-altruist 16 minutes ago
10/22/2016 - Disjointed
by andybay 21 minutes ago
I need a Black repotoire agianst 1.e4
by lwk-altruist 22 minutes ago
Ponziani opening traps
by GDring 27 minutes ago
Trying to Choose Opening for Black against 1. d4
by gchess33 28 minutes ago
HUMORISTIC FUNNY CHESS PICS, IMAGES, CARICATURES, ETC...
by MACRINUS 51 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!