21731 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I just finished a computer analysis of a game I played earlier today. Here is the beginning of the game up to the move I'm confused about:
My last move, Bc5, was annotated as "Bc5?!" by the computer analysis engine. I'm not claiming that was my best move. What I'm confused about is the computer claims Nxe4 would have been the best move, which, apparently, would have been followed by white's Qe2. Is the computer confused or am I missing something here? Nxe4 obviously kills my Knight.
Should I not have as much faith in this chess engine as I do, or is there something deeper I'm not seeing?
actually if you wil go for Nxe4 than you will get Rook
It gave the question mark because you would have gotten a free pawn if you played Nxe4. That or you would end up roughly a rook up like the line in my diagram.It gave the exclamation sign because it was still a valid idea.
There is nothing wrong with the chess engine...after 3...Nxe4 black is winning, since 4.fxe4 Qh4+ 5.g3 Qxe4+. Now there are no good moves for white. This is like a reverse Damiano defense, or something
if you opponent move king than I think codition will be worse..
(The only thing I don't agree with is giving a "?!" to Bc5. That's a good move too...but Nxe4 was more incisive there.)
It's not that easy.
After 1.e4 e5 2.c4 Nf6 3.f3 Nxe4 4.fxe4 Qh4+ 5.Ke2 Qxe4+ 6.Kf2 Bc5+ 7.d4 Bxd4+ 8.Kg3 h5 9.h3 the typical Damiano trick 9...Bxb2 does not work here as after 10.Bd3 Black cannot play 10...Qa4.
I guess Black has some advantage after 9...Qg6+, but I'd rather play 3...Bc5! which clamps nicely to the weakened g1-a7 diagonal, and white's position is simply a mess.
Thanks IM pfren, that is a very insightful observation. The c4 pawn does make that subtle difference. Shredder gave 8...Qf5 as a way to keep black's edge, but I definitely see how it's not just simply a reverse Damiano. Cool and instructve post!
like everyone said, if you find your opponent playing the Damiano's Defence, you take his e-pawn with your knight
Wow, quite instructive. Look at this little gem that is just in the forum posts. Thanks, everyone. This is the most interesting thing I have read, watched, or heard about in days. I appreciate high rated players taking time out to crack open these lines of play.
yes thank you everyone
By the way, it's nice to see a fellow IPU follower.
How To Use Computer for Analysis
by GalaxKing a few minutes ago
Should I learn the Dutch or Czech Benoni?
by Sred 2 minutes ago
youre worst mistake in chess :)
by MarcoBR444 3 minutes ago
I don't want to win that way..
by danthemasterman 5 minutes ago
help analyzing some games
by Drzcoyotex3 5 minutes ago
5/30/2016 - Tarjan - Karpov, 1976
by Shahabs 11 minutes ago
I feel like I'm overrated
by Don_frye1 16 minutes ago
Team USA: Northwest Members Petition
by Chessandfaith 16 minutes ago
Chess in Washington D.C. Area?
What Would You Do If You Lose Against a Player Lower Rated Than You?
by PhalanxGr8 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!