Is Blitz chess respected?


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #41

    chuckfloyd2011

    I love the longer time controls, but understand the need for time controls to be shorter especially on the net. I'll admit when I win on time, it feels cheap. When I lose on time with an easy winning position on the board, I realize it's just part of the game.   But, time shouldn't be the underlying factor that defines someone's chess.  If you have to avoid certain openings or lines of analysis because of lack of time, it's not your best chess.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #42

    TheArtofWar82

    chess_gg wrote:

    I have found that as I got better and better, I can play faster and faster.

    I didn't use to like blitz, for the reasons just stated. Nowadays, I like it more and more. And, a 5 min. per side seems ample to me. But, that's abaout as fast as I want to go. 

    Nail on the head.  Yeah for someone at my skill level and inexperience - I can't play "chess" at 5/0 or 3/2 time controls.  It's just too much.  However, I know when I'm watching two 2300+ players go at it in a blitz match that they're more than aware of what they're doing and it's actually extremely strategical...having to use the clock as a piece, if you will.

    It's just not where my true talent or interest lie in chess.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #43

    SocialPanda

    cjt33 wrote:
    TheBigDecline wrote:
    FEAR_THE_JOKER wrote:

    3 days per move games and all of the other long winded games are for picnic table players who want to die playing as few games of chess as humanly possible.  

    Not if you have dozens of correspondence games going on at the same time.

    ya but only noobs have dozens of games going on at once 

    Players on ICCF/LSS play dozens of games at the same time.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #44

    FirebrandX

    Ziryab wrote:
    FirebrandX wrote:
    cordata wrote:

     

    A game is a game to me: why should I even think about respecting it or not? And what would be the consequences of this?

    You don't respect the game, you respect the skill it takes to play at a world-beating level. Those 3000+ blitzers on playchess simply amaze me, and I have the utmost respect for that kind of rodent control.

    I've repaired your typo. 

    Whatever. A good chess player is usually a good blitz chess player. I've played about 30,000 blitz games in my life, and I know it's not a mindless exercise. There's far more planning and intent that goes into each move than you give credit for. Maybe it's because you're even weaker than I am at blitz as to why you think that way, but that's your problem.

    Bullet chess on the other hand, I have to side with Nigel Short's opinion that it is "chess masturbation".

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #45

    Doc_who_loves_chess

    Like any damaging and highly addictive activity, blitz MUST be both respected for the danger is poses to your chess abilities and if possible minimized or avoided.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #46

    Ziryab

    FirebrandX wrote:
    Ziryab wrote:
    FirebrandX wrote:
    cordata wrote:

     

    A game is a game to me: why should I even think about respecting it or not? And what would be the consequences of this?

    You don't respect the game, you respect the skill it takes to play at a world-beating level. Those 3000+ blitzers on playchess simply amaze me, and I have the utmost respect for that kind of rodent control.

    I've repaired your typo. 

    Whatever. A good chess player is usually a good blitz chess player. I've played about 30,000 blitz games in my life, and I know it's not a mindless exercise. There's far more planning and intent that goes into each move than you give credit for. Maybe it's because you're even weaker than I am at blitz as to why you think that way, but that's your problem.

    Bullet chess on the other hand, I have to side with Nigel Short's opinion that it is "chess masturbation".

    I've played twice as many blitz games as you. When you catch up, perhaps your skill will deteriorate as mine has.

     

     

    (I'm joking, of course. I thought you would have understood that.)

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #47

    daniel1607

    I observed that after playing several 1 and 3 min games and then switching to standard games, say 15/10 30 min I began to make quite a lot of blunders and lost several games in a row. In my opinion ultra fast games can contribute to some bad habits.First of all chess are meant to be deep, strategic game where you master the ability to predict 2-6 steps ahead rather then arcady game. 

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #48

    D4RK5YD

    Time is a crucial factor and yes it can become tedious but it's part of the game as a whole

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #49

    rDulac

    I disregard them, but I'm biased towards long games.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #50

    electric_limes

    Let's face it,the best thing about blitz is its entertainment value.And the worst,its addictive nature.It certainly lacks the overall quality of longer time control chess-especially classical-but people don't play blitz to prove it can be as respectable as classical,they just play to have fun.If it were up to the Americans,they would ban classical chess and proclaim blitz and bullet the only worthy type of chess.Fortunately,we are not there yet.

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #51

    zborg

    Blitz is fine.  Just watch and learn --

    Game at 3/0, between two players above 2200+, are excellent learning tools.  Unless the games get sloppy at the very end.  So Enjoy Them.

    **P.S., This thread is 2 years old.  The jokes on us.  Laughing

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #52

    codexone

    zborg wrote:

    Blitz is fine.  Just watch and learn --

    Game at 3/0, between two players above 2200+, are excellent learning tools.  Unless the games get sloppy at the very end.  So Enjoy Them.

    **P.S., This thread is 2 years old.  The jokes on us.  

    Definitely not a blitz thread...

  • 10 months ago · Quote · #53

    RonaldJosephCote

            Respected?  You mean like a root canal?Yell


Back to Top

Post your reply: