A better question: why does anyone care what abritrary number is assigned to the "value" of pieces? It's amazing how much effort is expended upon assigning random numbers to pieces that tell you "how good" they are regardless of the position. It reminds me of people on the internet bragging about IQ, another favorite topic (http://www.chess.com/forum/view/general/any-others-with-high-iq-suck-at-chess). Piece values are a random number that mean nothing and prove nothing, as everything is relative and depends on the situation.
KNIGHTS ARE TOO UNDERVALUED
Sort:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
Hey. You're talking to a boy.
Just because I act like a girl doesn't mean I am one.
Yes, but earlier you said: "I'm a boy (although I wish I weren't)." I suggest, sir (or madam), that you are an impostor or double agent! (or something like that).
You are clearly bored.
Only because you're not nearly as much fun about this as I hoped you would be.
But where would you get the boredom that make you want to repeatedly comment on a forum that you don't seem to be contibuting to?
At least he makes redundant/useless topics more interesting 
AndyClifton wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
Hey. You're talking to a boy.
Just because I act like a girl doesn't mean I am one.
Yes, but earlier you said: "I'm a boy (although I wish I weren't)." I suggest, sir (or madam), that you are an impostor or double agent! (or something like that).
That took a few tries to get it to post correctly.
Interestingly, both Andy and VV appear to use the same eye shadow.
Metastable wrote:
Interestingly, both Andy and VV appear to use the same eye shadow.
WHAT
chrisr2212 wrote:
VULPES_VULPES wrote:
But where would you get the inspiration that make you want to creatively comment on a forum that is totally pointless ?
exactly!
I don't think I had ever typed that.
Hey. You're talking to a boy.
Just because I act like a girl doesn't mean I am one.