Forums

More proof this site is rigged

Sort:
Antonin1957

Maybe you don't win because you are not skilled enough.

WereThoseGoodMoves
KronosMC90 wrote:
WereThoseGoodMoves wrote:
KronosMC90 wrote:
WereThoseGoodMoves wrote:
KronosMC90 wrote:

To be fair it's hard to win when you resign on move 3 constantly.

You didn't read what I posted. I drop 50, then I play.

I DON'T RESIGN THAT GAME!!!

I just looked at 10 + of your losses. 3 moves then over. Then you go and play 90% accuracy against low rated players. Just a troll imo.

Which 10? Be specific.

You pick. Looked like most of your losses tbf.

Then you are admitting you aren't looking at the right games. If you are saying anything proves your case, then I will do the same as it pertains to YOU. Any of the games, even the ones resigned under 5 moves proves my case (AS IT RELATES TO YOU AND YOU ONLY). If you don't want to look at the patterns and the specifics, then neither will I (AS IT RELATES TO YOU AND YOU ONLY).

sndeww
WereThoseGoodMoves wrote:
sndeww wrote:

you can try learning about the game outside of spamming games. Have you considered that 1300s make mistakes and sometimes you get lucky?

If it happened here and there, yes, I wouldn't complain. But how does the same pattern happen on every account for the past few years? 1) Your account is 5 years old, have you looked into this yourself? 2) Your rating is way out of the range of what I am addressing. Yes, to YOU 1000-1500 players are making mistakes, but what would happen if 1500-2000s kept beating you bringing your rating down to 1700?

I once used to be a 1000 rated player. In my first game on this site, I started with a 1200, beat someone, peaked 1300, then fell down to below 1100. If random 1500-1700s kept beating me, I would figure that I am simply not playing at a level befitting of my rating.

I fail to see any sort of incentive for chess.com to implement bots that force people to lose. Maybe, at the beginning, they have you play against weak "bots" to encourage you to play more. Then they remove them and you play real people. A lot of games do this, but outside of that chess.com has no incentive to purposefully create bots just to bring random people's rating down. It only makes them depressed and more likely to leave, which would obviously be bad. Yet, in 2019 the average rating was 800, now it's 600.

WereThoseGoodMoves
Antonin1957 wrote:

Maybe you don't win because you are not skilled enough.

Actually, the opposite happened. I won not skilled enough, or......

KronosMC90

5 moves queen sac. Game done. Thrown game.

WereThoseGoodMoves
sndeww wrote:

Maybe, at the beginning, they have you play against weak "bots" to encourage you to play more. Then they remove them and you play real people.

WereThoseGoodMoves
KronosMC90 wrote:

5 moves queen sac. Game done. Thrown game.

Look at the rating, I was 875, lowering the rating to 850. That's a clue there Einstein. If you had read my numbered list reply, you would know I lowered it by 50s. Put another quarter in and try again buckaroo.

KronosMC90
WereThoseGoodMoves wrote:
KronosMC90 wrote:

5 moves queen sac. Game done. Thrown game.

Look at the rating, I was 875, lowering the rating to 850. That's a clue there Einstein. If you had read my numbered list reply, you would know I lowered it by 50s. Put another quarter in and try again buckaroo.

cry course bro. You have like a 20 game sus losing streak. Keep sandbagging then complaining on the forums

HangingPiecesChomper

why are people accusing the op of being a troll when I also agree this site is rigged?

basketstorm
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

why are people accusing the op of being a troll when I also agree this site is rigged?

Because you are also a troll.

HangingPiecesChomper
basketstorm wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

why are people accusing the op of being a troll when I also agree this site is rigged?

Because you are also a troll.

how am i a troll when clearly i take chess more seriously than you. in fact what you say is completely irrelevant with your 200 blitz rating hanging pieces every other move.

KronosMC90
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

why are people accusing the op of being a troll when I also agree this site is rigged?

Because you are also a troll.

how am i a troll when clearly i take chess more seriously than you. in fact what you say is completely irrelevant with your 200 blitz rating hanging pieces every other move.

You've been trolling all day. cry

basketstorm
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:
basketstorm wrote:
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

why are people accusing the op of being a troll when I also agree this site is rigged?

Because you are also a troll.

how am i a troll when clearly i take chess more seriously than you. in fact what you say is completely irrelevant with your 200 blitz rating hanging pieces every other move.

Only trolls take chess seriously

HangingPiecesChomper

only trolls have a 200 blitz rating. you practically have to lose on purpose to have a rating that low

WereThoseGoodMoves
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

only trolls have a 200 blitz rating. you practically have to lose on purpose to have a rating that low

I would never do that.

basketstorm
HangingPiecesChomper wrote:

only trolls have a 200 blitz rating. you practically have to lose on purpose to have a rating that low

At least everyone can be sure that I'm not cheating