My best pawn centred game + Was this a good sac?

BobbyPhisher960

He's not even a troll. Trolls are actually funny and smart.

RedGirlZ

Trolls aren't funny or smart lol

BobbyPhisher960

Depends on whom are you reffering.

IAMBBW
RedGirlZ wrote:

 ^go troll elsewhere

Huh 

ghost_of_pushwood

And you thought he wasn't smart!

BobbyPhisher960

😂

IAMBBW

Okay

Russ_Houghton

O yeah. He's got nothing, at least nothing soon, and your bishop is a BEAST. His position is a smooth, well paved highway for your pawn convoy. 

 
ghost_of_pushwood

Okay, I'm puttin' on some C W McCall!

lyckosam

Weak squares around your king, is less of a problem when few attacking pieces on the board, also you had NO bishop pair, so your knight was infiltrated and stronger, even if the exchange was easier to play; so your notation was incorrect. However, he could regain the pawn with better moves and keep a good position. At move 25, you did end up with a past pawn and if you can trade away all pieces, or just the queens,  you have an advantageous endgame. Because the exchange 37. Rxd5 makes your lead 1 pawn instead of 2, but your position is strong enough to convert, only a computer can really handle this somewhat... the exchange was OK, even if 2 pawns should be enough for you to convert. King-safety is important, but I dont see this as hard to defend for a human, simply not enough pieces, if he had rooks controlling a line your king would be a lot more unsafe, but this was not the case, you worry to much! You missed a few forced-mates, so you need practice on mating, or mating-nets!

IAMBBW

Alright