18045 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Say you've calculated that a piece sacrifice gives you a good attack, say for example a Bxh6. It is however not clear for both players whether the sacrifice is sound or not. - Then your opponents declines your offer and plays an other move. I usually am disappointed. I foresaw some interesting stuff, but my opponent won't have anything of it. Or should I in that case be content with the extra pawn won?
Or should I in that case be content with the extra pawn won? - that is.
I always thought snagging extra material was a worthwhile result. But I could be wrong.
It might be the case that your opponent has seen a better counter-attacking line than simply accepting your sac... so, when your opponent declines, it might be a good time to see if he has a counter-punching continuation that you didn't see before.
On the other hand, if might be that your opponent is declining because he thinks that your sac is sound, and is allowing you to keep the material you've gained so that he can defend more effectively... in which case, congratulations, you've won a pawn (or whatever).
@TeraHammer: yeah but the point is it wasn't a sac because the opponent didn't take it. So not knowing the position, I assume our protagonist won a piece and moved out of the sac position?
@teraHammer: yes indeed. I wish the OP would have posted the game.
Well I feel like crap, because usually the sacrifice is the first move in a great idea, and when it is declined, I'm befuddled and out of ideas (unless I can snag some material). I have had a few recent games in which my offered sac was declined, and I just thought opponent knew what I was doing. So, yes, it made me feel deflated.
You could play another game. Accepting the sacrifices is by no means obligatory in chess.
My personal feeling is that if a sac gains an advantage or wins a game only if my opponent happens to accept it, well, it's not really such a brilliant idea in the first place -- no matter how clever it may seem otherwise. If a sac works only when it's accepted and not otherwise, then it's more on the order of a gimmick or a swindle rather than an actual brilliancy. But hey, that may be just me. Your results may vary. Offer void where prohibited.
Can everyone please get a clue about what is and is not the Fried Liver
by wayne_thomas a few minutes ago
5/25/2016 - From Side To Side
by sharafi_mh 3 minutes ago
Amazing New opening!!!
by adumbrate 4 minutes ago
Need help seeing hwere I went wrong
by Inexorable88 5 minutes ago
How to crush the Nimzo!
by adumbrate 5 minutes ago
My first win against Computer 4
by ChessOath 5 minutes ago
Sicilian Sveshnikov Help ( 15. Qh3 & 18.Qg4)
by LotsofSnuff227 5 minutes ago
Fried Liver Attack without Two Knights Defence
by ChessOath 7 minutes ago
Unpopularity in America
by PLAYtoWINtheGAME 8 minutes ago
2305 is just a number...
by Harish73 9 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!