Btw, I don't remeber if you can do this, but I'm pretty sure you can ask the website's computer to analyze the game
Thanks, I just submitted my game for analysis.
Btw, I don't remeber if you can do this, but I'm pretty sure you can ask the website's computer to analyze the game
Thanks, I just submitted my game for analysis.
I like your annotations very much. You have a good grasp of the game but of course have a thing or two to learn.
I like your annotations very much. You have a good grasp of the game but of course have a thing or two to learn.
Thanks
I will leave it to the psychologists to suggest why you see only the positive in your move when you see only the negative in your opponent's exact same move.
Demonstratating his logic/why he moved is very important. More so then why he should have not because he did not know why he should not and left it to the higher rating to show him what logic he was not considering and left it to them to be critical.
I stopped reading your comments after move 2. You find the positive aspect of your 2.c3 but find only the negative in opponent's 2...c6. But they are the same move! If you say 2...c6 is a bad move because it neither develops a piece nor controls the center, why do you not see the same for 2.c3?
I will leave it to the psychologists to suggest why you see only the positive in your move when you see only the negative in your opponent's exact same move.
2.c3 controls the important central square d4. But 2..c6 by my opponent doesn't control d5 because d5 is already occupied by black's pawn. So 2..c6 just looses a tempo, that's why it is a mistake.
I stopped reading your comments after move 2. You find the positive aspect of your 2.c3 but find only the negative in opponent's 2...c6. But they are the same move! If you say 2...c6 is a bad move because it neither develops a piece nor controls the center, why do you not see the same for 2.c3?
I will leave it to the psychologists to suggest why you see only the positive in your move when you see only the negative in your opponent's exact same move.
2.c3 controls the important central square d4. But 2..c6 by my opponent doesn't control d5 because d5 is already occupied by black's pawn. So 2..c6 just looses a tempo, that's why it is a mistake.
You are either joking or hopeless. Maybe both.
Why do you think so? Please explain the flaw in my logic, if there is any.
Please tell me.
Hey don't try to explain things to a guy higher rated then you. Your only like 800. c6 is the same as c3. THE PAWN ON D5 DOESN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!!!The point of c6 and c3 are to support d5 and d4 respectively. Why would a pawn on d5 change anything?If you say that c6 loses a tempo, then c3 loses a tempo.
Please tell me.
Hey don't try to explain things to a guy higher rated then you. Your only like 800. c6 is the same as c3. THE PAWN ON D5 DOESN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!!!The point of c6 and c3 are to support d5 and d4 respectively. Why would a pawn on d5 change anything?If you say that c6 loses a tempo, then c3 loses a tempo.
Please read #31
Please tell me.
Hey don't try to explain things to a guy higher rated then you. Your only like 800. c6 is the same as c3. THE PAWN ON D5 DOESN'T MAKE A DIFFERENCE!!!!The point of c6 and c3 are to support d5 and d4 respectively. Why would a pawn on d5 change anything?If you say that c6 loses a tempo, then c3 loses a tempo.
Please read #31
So then #33 is the correct answer. Explaining it to you doesn't seem to help you at all.
Btw, I don't remeber if you can do this, but I'm pretty sure you can ask the website's computer to analyze the game