Promoting pawns when you are ahead in material...Rude?

  • #321

    suppose you are playing a cheat and it's 2 moves from checkmate, you're getting thrashed but your opponent gets booted before the mate, would you have felt thick for resigning too early ?

  • #322
    Fulliautomatix wrote:

    suppose you are playing a cheat and it's 2 moves from checkmate, you're getting thrashed but your opponent gets booted before the mate, would you have felt thick for resigning too early ?

    First i would want him back to give him the whuppin he deserves. 2nd i would want to do it again. 3rd i repeat first 2 previosly mentioned. 4th i would forget that game so quick as it meant nothing. 5th is what i take on those type of situations.

  • #323

    and the 6th ?

    (just in case it might make any sense)

  • #324
    ollave wrote:
    ClavierCavalier wrote:

    Elubas does have a point.  There have been many examples of someone miscalculating something in what would otherwise be a winning game.  I know I've often became too comfortable in a game and missed an important, but easy to stop move.

     

    One thing I _do_ tend to do when mate is 2-3 moves out and the opponents moves are forced is put in conditional moves. Which I intend as a gentle hint that "Hey, you were *so* lost you could have resigned."

    This reminds me of this game.  There are several ways to mate here.  Free members get only one line, so I went with the most forcing one just for the conditional moves.  This starts a couple of moves ahead because I thought the black was clever with Ke7, tempting b8=Q??, giving them a stalemate.

    This game also uses promotion when already ahead!

  • #325

    nice

  • #326

    There is an Australian expression which is apt in this situation -

       'If a man's down, keep your foot on his neck.'

  • #327

    1 1 bullet game, we both did way more than our fair share of nonsensical moves. and we both finished with over 3 minutes...

  • #328

    If I have anything less than two queens and the checkmate isn't obvious then yeah I'm promoting. More than two queens is overkill. lol

  • #329

    In online games, I prefer the quickest way to win, except when there is a forcing sequence (or more than one) of moves that lead to mate, which I can enter and then ignore the game until it's over. OTB: whatever's quickest.

    @ekorbai, haven't heard that one before, but you might like this one. Australian fairness ... for values of fairness: "Don't hit a man when he's down. Kick him, it's easier." Wink (Not that I know if that saying is particularly Australian, but it may be; these days the "never give a sucker an even break" is more likely to be heard.)

  • #330

    I think you should Always Need 2 Queens. One Queen makes The Mate and The Other Queen makes a meal for you.

  • #331
  • #332

    You missed 87... Ne1.

  • #333

    Yeah I saw that after :(

Top
or Join

Online Now