19887 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I'm really not sure what the guy means by "level playing field" - everybody has the same databases available.
We don't in fact. Some of us have spent hundreds of hours gathering obscure games, weeding out junk, honing specialized databases. Some have spent thousands purchasing the best annotated collections--training DVDs, Chess Informant, Mega Database, and so on.In fact, the differences are like the development of skill itself. We're not all equal. Some people thrive on their own mediocrity and attempt to impose it on those who aim higher.
Well, fair enough then- but others could put that effort in if they wanted (minus the purchasing part). There's nothing stopping frankyyy from using the same raw data to play his games as you (apart from the fact he obviously isn't strong enough to comprehend the whole concept). Certainly, the world is not skewed against him.
Personally, I make do with quite readily available stuff, and mainly just use the database to have a casual look through games in a specific line, looking for the interesting different ideas that different players use. Statistics are only of a brief interest.
I have to thank the OP though - I was unaware that this brand of chess was not "real chess", where the object is, it seems, to go in completely blind to every game, push wood forward semi-randomly and see what the outcome turns out to be.
I was lucky in my efforts to expand my collection of Informants. The company gave me a bunch when I placed fifth in a contest (500 Euros worth of software was a nice prize).http://chessskill.blogspot.com/2009/05/best-of-best-chess-informant-readers.html
Chess.com worst website on the internet
by Connor_Macleod1518 3 minutes ago
8/26/2016 - Kouatly - Tsheshkovsky, Hoogovens 1988
by Kotteb 4 minutes ago
e4 c5 bc4?
by Uhohspaghettio1 4 minutes ago
Chess legends. Where would be Carlson's position in a list?
by badenwurtca 4 minutes ago
What do you say when people ask how good at chess you are ?
by OmgItsLiz 5 minutes ago
Does most of the world really love the stalemate factor?
by evertVB 5 minutes ago
I hate openings
by AIM-AceMove 6 minutes ago
by Destroyer_Mark_1420 7 minutes ago
Chessbazaar Reykjavik Championship set in Sheesham, 3.8" king
by jinnymer 7 minutes ago
Looking for ideas on what to add to our chess clock
by Bawker 9 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!