14978 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Good - as improving one's rating is something to aim for and gives you an idea where you and your opponent are chess playing ability wise.
Bad - as it can pander to pride, foster fear and is can be an unnecessary distraction.
Ratings more often than not do reflect a player’s ability but never be deceived – "good" players can disappoint and "weak" players can astound.
While I am inclined to afford higher rated players more respect when playing than lower ones, I have learnt it is often better to play everyone with equal respect and play each move on merit.
My own rating has steadily gone up since I started playing a year ago but not by so much that I can be carried away or would dare place myself among the chess playing elite.
Of the 10% of games I have won because my opponent has timed out, the net affect on my rating has been for it to slightly increase overall – this helps put things into perspective.
Ratings can be useful when the idea is to facilitate balanced games in team matches and tournaments.
I’m sure other chess.com members have other views and perspectives – it would be nice to read them!
I really like Dan Heisman's suggestion that ratings be kept by federations for internal tracking, but that class norms be the only publically visible indicator for individual ratings. This is actually a really great idea in my mind as it has very few drawbacks, and really serves to address the negatives that are created by people trying to protect their ratings.
How long does it take to be a 2000 rate player?
by jambyvedar 2 minutes ago
Title Submission Problem
by MissMoomin 4 minutes ago
"Chess is 1% inspiration and 99% tactics."
by 0110001101101000 5 minutes ago
Does Karjakin even have a "puncher's chance"?
by LauriAikio 8 minutes ago
10/27/2016 - Four Way Street
by Sashko56 11 minutes ago
Mods, get rid of the forum spoilers.
by Bilbo21 15 minutes ago
Do I have the potential to be a GM one day??
by Squarely 18 minutes ago
Rematch Request Etiquette
by alinfe 19 minutes ago
by pjreed86 19 minutes ago
by pjreed86 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!