Sacked EVERYTHING for the win!!

JayeshSinhaChess
 
  3I0 blitz.
LouStule
Good game. As a side note, how are you able to get the notes to show up in the game notation? I can add them ok when I go to the load pgn app but when I insert the game into a forum post the notes are never in the notation anymore. How are you doing it? Thanks
PowerofHope

 



PowerofHope

White player should feel ashamed, he lost a won game.

JayeshSinhaChess

 You make a lot of references to stockfish evaluation. However I wasn't playing against stockfish, was I? Even I admit in the notation that all the sacrifices were not sound and that at some point white was completely winning as per computer evaluation. However computer evaluation means little in a quick game when the pressure is piling and the threats against the king keep building up.

LeeTaylor85

on 25. you moved ...N-KB5, I would've played R-KN1 +

LeeTaylor85

25...R-KN1 +

drmrboss
PowerofHope wrote:

White player should feel ashamed, he lost a won game.

This is what you should be expected at this level! Win/Loss are like roller coaster, the winner is the one who dropped less pieces. meh.png

JayeshSinhaChess

@LouStule - you put the PGN in - https://www.chess.com/analysis-board-editor and then right click on the moves to write your comments after the moves.

MMMJACOBSTAR

19 Qb3 lost the game.   Common N and Q pin blunder.   Nothing so spectacular except for white having more blunders than black, which is rare.

ghost_of_pushwood
JayeshSinhaChess wrote:

computer evaluation means little in a quick game when the pressure is piling and the threats against the king keep building up.

That may be true while you're playing it.  But when you post such a game in the forums (with a rather provocative title), you're virtually inviting such responses. wink.png

JayeshSinhaChess

I wouldn't consider this title provocative, also I did sack every piece just to carve open his king. If he was unable to defend under the pressure, that shouldn't be blamed on me. The whole point was to pile on the pressure and when that happens the attacker usually wins, esp. in 3I0 blitz or shorter.

tipish

there are ppl that always win or they're just posting every time they win? a title Idea "this is how you lose" usually is only when your opponent lost. no?

ghost_of_pushwood

Well Jayesh, you shouldn't be complimented for it either (especially when he overlooked a perpetual, among other things).  And yes, I still consider the title rather provocative...

ghost_of_pushwood

And tipish, what is provocative is not the word "win."  The phrase "Sacked EVERYTHING for the win" will likely imply to many that the whole business was sound.

Perhaps a more accurate (and honest) title would've been:  "Sacked EVERYTHING...and somehow managed to win."  Or:  "Threw a bunch of junk at some guy in a 3 minute game and he collapsed."

josiahpower

wow

ghost_of_pushwood

 Yes, perhaps "wow" would've been the best title of all. happy.png

tipish

ghost_of_pushwood wrote:

 Yes, perhaps "wow" would've been the best title of all. happy.png

!!!

Icecream4crow
drmrboss wrote:
PowerofHope wrote:

White player should feel ashamed, he lost a won game.

This is what you should be expecting at this level! Win/Loss are like roller coaster, the winner is the one who dropped less pieces. 

I wonder if  persons playing white should feel ashamed when they lose considering  white has the advantage of first move? He simply made the second to last mistake. and won.  :-))

president_max
JayeshSinhaChess wrote:
 
 
  3I0 blitz.

29. Qg7