So Many Fakes on Chess.com

Sort:
Avatar of pfren
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:

Thrillerfan is one of the few trusted sources here. He's the. 1% in a site of 99.9% lunacy.

I'm doing the math on this, and conclude that he is 90 percent a lunatic.

Avatar of ThrillerFan
pfren wrote:
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:

Thrillerfan is one of the few trusted sources here. He's the. 1% in a site of 99.9% lunacy.

I'm doing the math on this, and conclude that he is 90 percent a lunatic.

So wait a minute. I call you out as one of the few positive resources on here, and then you throw me under the bus?

Show me 10 posts of mine where 9 of them are BS and not of OBVIOUS SARCASM, such as one of my favorite sarcasm words - PA-LEEZ!.

That would be 90%. DARE YA!

Avatar of AwesomeAtti
ThrillerFan wrote:
pfren wrote:

I'm doing the math on this, and conclude that he is 90 percent a lunatic.

That would be 90%. DARE YA!

That would be 100% 💯 Grade A ragebait.

Avatar of crotonninja1isagm

bro tspmo lowkey if u dont wanna deal with trolls just dont use the forums unc its not helping ur chess by brainrotting on here anway

Avatar of pfren
ThrillerFan wrote:
pfren wrote:
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:

Thrillerfan is one of the few trusted sources here. He's the. 1% in a site of 99.9% lunacy.

I'm doing the math on this, and conclude that he is 90 percent a lunatic.

So wait a minute. I call you out as one of the few positive resources on here, and then you throw me under the bus?

Show me 10 posts of mine where 9 of them are BS and not of OBVIOUS SARCASM, such as one of my favorite sarcasm words - PA-LEEZ!.

That would be 90%. DARE YA!

Well, it is simple math. If you (or anyone else at that) are 1% of the site, and the lunatics are 99.9%, then AT LEAST nine tenths of that one precent are under the lunatic umbrella.

Avatar of JatinStrikes

@AwesomeAtti article was crazyyy

Avatar of crotonninja1isagm
pfren wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
pfren wrote:
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:

Thrillerfan is one of the few trusted sources here. He's the. 1% in a site of 99.9% lunacy.

I'm doing the math on this, and conclude that he is 90 percent a lunatic.

So wait a minute. I call you out as one of the few positive resources on here, and then you throw me under the bus?

Show me 10 posts of mine where 9 of them are BS and not of OBVIOUS SARCASM, such as one of my favorite sarcasm words - PA-LEEZ!.

That would be 90%. DARE YA!

Well, it is simple math. If you (or anyone else at that) are 1% of the site, and the lunatics are 99.9%, then AT LEAST nine tenths of that one precent are under the lunatic umbrella.

i think u missed a decimal point he said hes in the 0.1 percent of the site.

Avatar of pfren
Crotonninja1 wrote:
pfren wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
pfren wrote:
LieutenantFrankColumbo wrote:

Thrillerfan is one of the few trusted sources here. He's the. 1% in a site of 99.9% lunacy.

I'm doing the math on this, and conclude that he is 90 percent a lunatic.

So wait a minute. I call you out as one of the few positive resources on here, and then you throw me under the bus?

Show me 10 posts of mine where 9 of them are BS and not of OBVIOUS SARCASM, such as one of my favorite sarcasm words - PA-LEEZ!.

That would be 90%. DARE YA!

Well, it is simple math. If you (or anyone else at that) are 1% of the site, and the lunatics are 99.9%, then AT LEAST nine tenths of that one precent are under the lunatic umbrella.

i think u missed a decimal point he said hes in the 0.1 percent of the site.

I can see a dot there, but it is attached to "the" so it should be read as one percent.

Avatar of LieutenantFrankColumbo

Lol... The things people will find to argue over.