It's useful to solve some tactics but if you do it too much then you would make stupid sacs in real games. Tactics is not the same like playing normal game with long time control or analysing with an engine or a coach.
tactics and improvement
I feel the tactics are a great help. Not only with positioning, but with looking over the entire board with each move. I've discovered since joining that my biggest problem is focusing too much on pieces that are currently being attacked. I had a bad habit of trying to save whatever piece. I'm assuming this is a problem for a lot of beginners. The tactics trainer has been huge in teaching me to stop ignoring what else is going on. There is almost always a better move than the first one you see.
Tactics are the backbone of chess. Maybe you can do okay without a backbone for awhile, but eventually if your fundamentals are bad you will find it impossible to improve.
If you thinking of upgrading for the sake of doing tactics, then I would recommend against it. There are many websites offering free tactic training.
If you are weak in tactics your whole game is bad, what profit is it to get great position and lose because of poor tactics abilities.
I am not going to advise novices that constant tactical practice is necessary because it's just not true.
Tactics are the backbone of chess. Maybe you can do okay without a backbone for awhile, but eventually if your fundamentals are bad you will find it impossible to improve.
By far the best answer on this thread. All other sayings here what is true and what not are neither helpful nor ontopic.
Without necessary details your backbone is like butter. Sorry but this applies to almost everything in life and u are trying to negate this
Spending 1,000 hours in tactics trainer is not the best use of your time. Anybody who says that is lying to you.
Tactical study is a must for any player regardless of strength but to improve to the next rating level requires better tactics to beat your peers and go higher. If player desires to go to 1400 and he is at 1200 , tactics alone will get him there, not opening or strategy.
I know I'm late here but allow me to offer my two cents as tired as I am. . ( I think 2 1/2 hours of sleep qualifies for being tired,well at least it's a Saturday right?)
Any way I think studying tactics for an hour a day (if you can spare it,most books say 15 minutes a day or 10 problems or so a day over a period of time would reap benefits,I do my tactics throughout the day,so I don't exactly clock how much time I spend each day doing them,it probably varies). would definitely help. I personally believe you learn more from studying Chess then you do from playing,one thing that playing can teach you that studying can't is the pressure of being in a game under time controls and studying really can't tell you how to handle a painful loss and I won't even mention winning because nobody ever suffered a win.
Again,as is already known the goal is pattern recognition and the hope is to see these "patterns" in your own games.
It's useful to solve some tactics but if you do it too much then you would make stupid sacs in real games. Tactics is not the same like playing normal game with long time control or analysing with an engine or a coach.
I don't think you can ever do "too many" tactics,now I will say that doing tactics you already know over and over may not yield you any profits but if by "too many" you mean too many tactics in general,I don't think there is such a thing.
Solving many tactics from different angles,squares etc. helps you gain board vision. I remember when I first started with tactics in one of Susan Polgar's books,I was used to those tactics,when I went to another book,even though it was the same forks,pins etc.,I was missing alot of them because I hadn't seen it done that. The lesson there I think is that a wide variety of different tactical definitely would help then just a few choice tactics.
Also a stupid sac? No such thing? If you sac a piece there should be a reason that you did it right? Even if it was just to open up a line or something like that.
I do agree with the last thing you said about tactics not being the same as playing a long game,tactics is merely one of many building blocks to having a strong game.
Tactics are the backbone of chess. Maybe you can do okay without a backbone for awhile, but eventually if your fundamentals are bad you will find it impossible to improve.
I totally agree with this,but I would say even if your fundamentals are good,even if you're good at positional Chess and even if you're an expert at Chess strategy,if you don't know tactics those things won't really matter because you'll be dropping pieces not unlike a kid playing hot potato.
There are 12-24 tactics known.