22358 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Lots of posts about tactics being 'easy' or 'too easy' in the tactic problems comment section.
The practice of repeating lots of simple tactical ideas is key for instantly recognising these patterns in games for all levels of players up to expert.
Even really good players can miss hanging pieces or a simple fork.
So instead of saying 'too easy' how about writing 'excellent tactic for improving my board vision and tactical awareness. Thanks Chess.com I love you'
Excellent post for improving my site appreciation and general awareness.
Thanks DJAbucus, I love you!
The reason that they say 'too easy' is because they don't see the value of practising simple tactics.
Regarding your idea for openings tactics. Tactics are about finding the best move in a position which wins material.
In many stages of the opening, there is no clear 'best move' so it wouldn't work. In your example I would play 3 d4 (the Scotch). This is not correct or incorrect. It's preference for a particular move in the opening.
Puzzles can be a good way to practise opening lines, but very labour intensive. Have you tried ChessPositionTrainer. It's great for what you may be looking for.
@doggy I love you too.
Some of them are easy... as in the only check on the board is mate (or something like this).
Some of them the people saying "easy" didn't solve the puzzle, people just say that. You'll also see comments "good puzzle, but ___ was a faster mate!" when of course it wasn't.
Anyway, don't worry about what others say.
Thanks wafflemaster...I'll try...
A tactic is "easy" when you are familiar with the underlying tactical pattern and more difficult when you have not seen it before. A group of players with the same rating on Tactics Trainer will vary in the patterns they know and don't know. Puzzles with nearly the same rating on TT will therefore vary quite a bit in how difficult they appear to be for each individual.
It is reassuring to know when you 'fail' a puzzle you have learned more than when you solve one that is easy for you. This is analogous to learning more from your losses in games than you learn from crushing a weaker opponent. For what it's worth, I'm convinced my time on TT is better for my game than studying openings.
I'm big into tactics atm. However, rather than using the rating system (which I think distracts from the real point of practising tactics) I set it to 'unrated'. I have read that it is best to become very familiar with basic tactical patterns before moving onto more complex combinations. Atm I am on 1000-1100. I will be spending as much time as possible on this section until tactics at this level become second nature.
An excellent site for tactics instruction (with some practice opportunity) is www.chesstactics.org. Helped me a lot a few years back.
"Hack Attack! with IM Thomas Rendle and John Sargent!"
How do you win as black?
by Sco64 a few minutes ago
Chess.com worst website on the internet
by Connor_Macleod1518 3 minutes ago
PawnCollector2013's account is closed!
by M-M_m 7 minutes ago
Test your Tactics! Ten tricky problems, can you go 10/10?
by Arisktotle 8 minutes ago
8/29/2016 - Outstretched
by Arisktotle 11 minutes ago
1rst Chess960 Correspondance Championship - Signup
by Smoothfang 12 minutes ago
1rst Chess960 Correspondance Championship Chess.com - Officilal page
by PositionalGenius 15 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by Connor_Macleod1518 15 minutes ago
Are GMs stupid?
by 0110001101101000 16 minutes ago
mate in two #3
by estenssoro 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!