18752 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I have a question relating to unrated players new to chess.com. Why are they unrated? When I first joined chess.com,I was given a rating of 1200.Has this rule been abandoned by chess.com now?
Hi chess_guy. You can play rated or unrated it is your choice. Although perhaps you did not notice when you first played, the drop box was set to rated and so you started your Glicko rating at 1200 with Rating Dispersion of 350. The other "unrated" fellas choose unrated always.
Everyone starts at 1200, it just displays as unrated until they have played the required amount of games (don't remember how many).
Hey Scottrf. Are you sure? I don't think so. Chess.com uses the Glicko system which takes care of new rating by assesing a large rating dispersion (RD). I guess you may be confussing with USCF regulations which indeed it does what you say, after 24 games you get your fisrt rating. Maybe the English chess federation is different but anyways that is what I know. Cheers.
Yes I am, and the rating needs a starting point whichever system is used.
Here is a game with a friend of mine, she has not played any rated games yet. It is a rated game but her rating shows "Unrated".
I think after just 1 game she get's a rating based on the player she has won/lost against.
Many thanks for your help guys,most appreciated.
I am currently in a tournament and against an unrated player. From viewing his past games and present it is clear he is not ranked at 1200 but much stronger. The rating adjustment for the game however if I lose will be as if I lose to a 1200. ...so not sure i like that much.. nothing time won't correct but it seems to me that in the outcome of his first set of rated games only his rating should change. Not the opponents. If he comes in unrated then my rating should not be rated as such..
But as a new player he will have a high RD, which means that your rating wont change as much as it would against an established 1200 player.
Hey Scottrf, no worries, I just checked and it has me at +2/-12 for the unrated game where a loss to a 1350 at my level is +2/-13 so I see what you mean.
and here I thought I knew everything about this site ;)
2/9/2016 - Tempo Time
by n9531l a few minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by AlanDewey 6 minutes ago
Friendly Game - He keeps whooping my ass.
by Fkey 7 minutes ago
2/10/2016 - Gregoriev, 1925
by maacos 13 minutes ago
by Diakonia 13 minutes ago
by rohitraaj 16 minutes ago
by SonOfThunder2 18 minutes ago
by akafett 20 minutes ago
Did I really fail at a tactics exercise because I did mate in 2 instead of in 1?
by Fkey 22 minutes ago
Will computers ever solve chess?
by Elroch 34 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!