Urk's Account Closed?

Sort:
RonaldJosephCote

Oh I doubt he's banned for life. Have him write a letter to Erik explaining that he's truely sorry for the inconvenience that he put the site through. Confession is good for the soul. Oh no!surprise.png  Religious hi-jackshock.png  I'm SOOo sorry.  A thousand apologies your honor.cry.png

NFork
CookedQueen wrote:
NFork wrote:

Urk is great! He writes interesting stuff. We need people like him in here. He is never unpolite.

 

When do people realize that he wasn't judged by his good and interesting stuff?

 

"My friend was honest and polite his entire life, then he drunk too much, drove the car against an eletrical tower and is in jail now.  BUT he was a really good person for the entire community." Does that matter for the judgement?

 

If it's about cheating then it's possible that the accusation is incorrect.

 

Being drunken is bit different thing. As drunken people do wrong things because one way or the other they can't control themselves.

 

For the question: yes it matters. I also wanted to tell what kind of writing we need in here. I only told my opinion.

fewlio

NFork is Finland a nordic country, and if so, are the people nordic?  and if they are not nordic, then how exactly is it a nordic country?

Cherub_Enjel

The answer is of course it matters.

To law it may or may not, but law has little to do with what's logical or right, which in this case we can say is the quality of chess.com forums.

GodsPawn2016
2Q1C wrote:

You're constantly accusing me of being "staff" so that's not true. If you want to post in Bonsai's threads then that's up to you. I choose not to. Also Urk has not been muted he has been banned for life.

1. You constantly accuse someone of being someone else.  

2. urk had his account closed for spreading lies.  Not banned for life.

schrodingerforluv

what a bunch of drama queens 2QD2, Cherub_Enjin, Urk_frum_Schmurk and co make. i'm making like they're different people of course, nod nod wink wink.

Bonsai_Dragon

2Q1C wrote:

You're constantly accusing me of being "staff" so that's not true. If you want to post in Bonsai's threads then that's up to you. I choose not to. Also Urk has not been muted he has been banned for life.

You don't "choose" not to, youve been blocked for well over a month, as you complained about publicially and called me a coward for doing so.

RonaldJosephCote

Hey fewlio,  your in the wrong threadevil.png                                                                                                                         null

CookedQueen
NFork wrote:

If it's about cheating then it's possible that the accusation is incorrect.

 

Once in the forum a mod has made a statement (not implying its necessarily a rule) that in case of wrong accusations (cheating would be one possibility) leading to an account close, the account could be opened again. The main difference between new account and reopen is the lost history which can get valuable for long term member.

 

Sure, the kind of interesting writing of Urk was very good for the site, many people think like this, me too.

Bonsai_Dragon

iluvzmetuna wrote:

what a bunch of drama queens 2QD2, Cherub_Enjin, Urk_frum_Schmurk and co make. i'm making like they're different people of course, nod nod wink wink.

Not that hard to recognize the drama queens, is it?

Bonsai_Dragon

As have we all, Susy

CookedQueen

What did the nanny always say?

Always be nice, helpful and relevant.

RonaldJosephCote

   Maybe I'm in left field but the last thing I remember was the chess game between 2Q and Cyborg. What ever happened to that??  Right after that game started is when I started having computer problems.

Bonsai_Dragon

 When you use user names, I will

 

Okay Susy?

GodsPawn2016
2Q1C wrote:
GodsPawn2016 wrote:
2Q1C wrote:

You're constantly accusing me of being "staff" so that's not true. If you want to post in Bonsai's threads then that's up to you. I choose not to. Also Urk has not been muted he has been banned for life.

1. You constantly accuse someone of being someone else.  

2. urk had his account closed for spreading lies.  Not banned for life.

 

1. Who do I accuse of being someone else and please link me to these statements?

2. You are free to do your own research and draw your own conclusions about anything Urk said.

2Q1C  

Bonsai_Dragon wrote:
2Q1C wrote:

You're constantly accusing me of being "staff" so that's not true. If you want to post in Bonsai's threads then that's up to you. I choose not to. Also Urk has not been muted he has been banned for life.

You don't "choose" not to, youve been blocked for well over a month, as you complained about publicially and called me a coward for doing so.

 

I am sure you have been called worse things than a coward William Heath.

2Q1C  

Can you please stop calling me Susy William Heath as I find it offensive. Thanks.

 

RonaldJosephCote

YEAH!  DUDEevil.png

RonaldJosephCote

  I'm more concerned why a 17 yr old needs to wipe his phone?

Bonsai_Dragon

Your point Susy?

Bonsai_Dragon

Will and William are two differnt names, care to tell us where the William came from? Should we call you by your other, perhaps older user names or the one you're using now, our your real name Susy? I mean, if we are going to invent names other than those used in the forum.....

RonaldJosephCote

  I stand corrected again. touche.     You know,  You started 400 threads arguing about everything under the sun. Taurusmale gave everybody a warning. We backed off,  you backed off.  Now you want to bring up those same threads created over a month ago and argue about who said what.  

This forum topic has been locked