14886 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
While trying to sleep last night after a long chess session I had the idea that perhaps the value of pieces change in bullet games. For example, when the time is running down and every move is more and more important and rushed, the versatility of a rook or a queen might make it that much more valueable than in a standard game. The propensity of a rook or Queen to complete more than one duty at a time might make them more valuable in bullet. Any input on this idea?
Queen = 13
Knight = 6
other pieces the same.
Initiative = 3-4
Objective good moves = bad moves
knights are worth more than queens when it gets really low
Queens are more powerfull than knights. I don't see how a knight can be more dangerous than a queen. Maybe by forks, but it's easy to prevent forks (in the endgame, at least) by just placing the pieces on diffrent colours. Then the knight is useless. Maybe they are rated 7 or 8 in extreme time trouble, but I doubt. In time trouble, giving a check or premoving is much more important than an objective advantage.
Viktor is that a standard or is it what you think the values are? I'm just curious.
Also I can't see a knight being worth more than a queen ever Oran, care to explain?
I can see how the value of the Knight increases, but I seriously doubt it rivals the queen, especially under pressure.
This is an interesting idea, however when I play bullet, I just... play. I'm not thinking hmmm... how much is my queen worth compared to his knight and 3 pawns, when taking into account that I have 2 seconds left on the clock, and he has 3? Naturally the value of the pieces always depends on the situation - It is very difficult to generalise how much the value of the pieces change when under time pressure
Oran just to follow up, I still disagree with the knight's value increasing to that of a rook. In the endgame and with increasing time pressure, it is going to be that much harder to find a fork with a knight than with a rook considering how many less pieces are in play. Also, the knights are more vulnerable in the end game as well.
In all chess variants knights are valued at least twice as high, though lower than the queen. Blindness via the knight's zigzag patterns are just too common.
Are you sure knights aren't better than queens in bughouse? They're the only nonblockable piece, which makes them very useful for dropped mates. As opposed to a queen, which allows to opponent to also drop a piece to block.
knights are very powerful but queens arent that much
In bughouse, I think two knights = queen
the pawns are worth much more imo
2 pawns = Rook
3 pawns = Knight
3 pawns = Bishop
6 pawns = Queen
In most of my games, a queen sack is well compensated if you get me two minor pieces. The rook is pretty much garbage in bughouse, unless you can "win the exchange" back by taking a bishop or knight.
better mouse is 2 points
the value of the pieces is secondary to time pressure and blundering and rudeness also plays its part. in time pressure complicate and sacrifice often take the day
The value of the pieces changes during non-bulet games too ^^
better mouse is more like 10 points lol.Connection is another 10.Ever played bullet on a touchpad with yellowbar everygame? >Macbook pro with wireless internet.
Playing bullet on the computer rather than on a mobile device is an instant +20 hands down.
PawnCollector2013's account is closed!
by RonaldJosephCote 2 minutes ago
I play a lot, but I'm not improving. What am I doing wrong?
by CrimsonKnight7 7 minutes ago
Advice for 1 d4 openings
by tob1a5 8 minutes ago
Which elo of the opponent is taken into account?
by Chlore31 9 minutes ago
is mike kummer really bad at chess or just have many haters?
by 0110001101101000 13 minutes ago
I am quitting chess.
by Jajakilroy 14 minutes ago
8/30/2016 - All Things Are Connected
by wcshogun 25 minutes ago
All The Reasons We Hate V3!
by Senior-Lazarus_Long 25 minutes ago
Queens Gambit Opening
by silvadavid1 26 minutes ago
mate in two #4
by camilodelgado 26 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!