13699 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
many ppl play offence defence type of chess which is not recommended.
3)looking for tactics
if 3 is not there then bypass to stratigy
hmmm any views frm higher rated players plz share ur views as it is a gud question
Capture center. Each move should be helpfull in that or defend opponent's threats.
After that capture opponent's king.
Why there is no algoritm in my answer?
Because chess players created thousends of books on topic and did not get perfect alghoritm. So, you think just few words is enough...
There is no perfect algorithm. However, every move, every good chess player aspires to do at least the following in some order:
1) identify opponent's threats
2) identify own threats
3) identify candidate moves that counter 1 and maximize 2
4) calculate out the candidate moves to a logical stopping point
5) choose a candidate move based on those calculations
6) double check the candidate move for safety before making it
There is no perfect order to do these steps in, though there is a general logical flow. Moreover, each step has multiple sub-steps that can be combined in differing ways. For example, some people will identify a threat, see a counter, start calculating, find a couple of good moves, calculate some more, spot a new threat as a result of calculating, identify a new counter calculate a new move, skip back to a previous calcuation without finishing one, skip back after double checking something, etc., etc., etc.,To some extent, one can't entirely control the process because you can't make yourself have insight into a position. That just happens when it happens. You can have spent 20 minutes getting to step 6 and just before your hand touches a piece you spot a threat you missed before and you're back at hte beginning. And to some extent, you don't want to be too rigid, creativity is inherently messy, you have to guide your thoughts without presumming to control them.
thanks friends fr some lovely tips
tnx buddy gud advice
a step should also be each time to consider as well why did the opponent move as he did, and what squares did he control before and after the move.
by Julius-Geezer a few minutes ago
What are points?
by liu_owen 3 minutes ago
5/25/2016 - From Side To Side
by DouglasSch 4 minutes ago
by samob917 12 minutes ago
A lol game ever
by ChessOath 22 minutes ago
Chess.com's Weekly Study: May 15th 2016
by rodash08 31 minutes ago
Pictures of Fischer
by Robert_New_Alekhine 41 minutes ago
by Paul_in_NJ 43 minutes ago
How to crush the Scandinavian
by Diakonia 47 minutes ago
People who DO NOT RESIGN in a lost position.
by Maliciam 52 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!