What the hell is this gambit bruh (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Ke7)
Sort:
Sep 16, 2023
0
#3
Basically no one should do that. Qg4 looks like a good check to make the king go away. Then develop your pieces and you win.
KeSetoKaiba wrote:
After they played g5 I played d4 defending the pawn (because if gxf4 Bxf4, which is exactly what happened in the game) and knight at the same time, and then after the pawn trade my opponent went sicko mode and played f6 like bruh
But still 2... Ke7 is a bad move I don’t think it has a name
I dont know figure it out
If I saw this played ay the West Orange Chess Club, we would give that person a warning to never EVER play that again (even in offhand games). One more infraction would be a 2 month suspension from even entering the building. If they ever did that again, a possible lifetime ban might be imposed. We will not tolerate people making a mockery of Chess!
Sep 16, 2023
0
#7
I think it's called Bong Cloud. It's not a gambit. It's a joke opening for streamers.
Sep 16, 2023
0
#9
ehm42 wrote:
CraigIreland wrote:
I think it's called Bong Cloud. It's not a gambit. It's a joke opening for streamers.
Craig, you act like you know everything, but in reality are only 1400 elo LMFAO
Welcome back. Did your forum ban just expire?
Sep 16, 2023
0
#10
ehm42 wrote:
@CraigIreland Also, I'm not wrong. You act like you know everything, like you are a 2000, but you are not even 1500. You try to criticize higher-rated players like @DoYouLikeCurry
It looks like you're back from your ban and eager to spread toxicity again. Your ban was your own fault and I didn't even report your posts.
Sep 16, 2023
0
#11
ehm42 wrote:
CraigIreland wrote:
ehm42 wrote:
@CraigIreland Also, I'm not wrong. You act like you know everything, like you are a 2000, but you are not even 1500. You try to criticize higher-rated players like @DoYouLikeCurry
It looks like you're back from your ban and eager for another argument. I decline.
I am not trying to argue, I just want to show you that you act like you know everything but really don't
Also, I was muted because chess.com thought I was using vulgar language when I did not
I can't imagine what knowing everything would be like so I wouldn't have the first idea how to act like it but I'm certain that I wouldn't be spending my time responding to your posts if I did.
Sep 16, 2023
0
#14
ehm42 wrote:
CraigIreland wrote:
I can't imagine what knowing everything would be like so I wouldn't have the first idea how to act like it but I'm certain that I wouldn't be spending my time responding to your posts if I did.
lol more proof you act like you know so much
I know enough to know how little I know.
My opponent actually played this against me, I was playong normal moves like 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3, and then I was expecting Nc6 or d6, but guess what my opponent played: KING E7!! This gambit is like 1. e4 b5 where Black just hangs the b-pawn for no reason, but in this one Black hangs the e-pawn for no reason and once I took Black’s pawn, Black played KING E6 threatening to take my knight. I then played f4 defending my knight but then my opponent played a great move: g5
So does that mean this opening can actually have a theory since idk this is the first time i have ever seen someone play Ke7 after e4, e5, and Nf3. Like the other opening that makes no sense of playing (1. e4 b5) has a theory (after Bxb5 there is Bb7 and then f5) so maybe this one also has a theory