19653 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hi guys, this is my another beginner's question about chess.What the "++" mark means?Soma say it means checkmate, some say it means double-check (which isn't always a checkmate)So, which one?Thanks, in advance.
if "+" is check, "++" looks like double check, especially since "#" is checkmate.
Is there a double check in the position?
I have seen ++ used to mean checkmate. In either usage it is not standard...
++ used to be check mate. You don't see it that often anymore since most use #. I laughed at ++ being double check.
A move which places the opponent's king in check usually has the notation "+" appended. Or sometimes a dagger is used: "†". Or the abbreviation: ch. Double check is commonly notated the same as check, but is sometimes represented specially as dbl ch, or in older books as "++". The Encyclopedia of Chess Openings omits any indication of check.
Checkmate at the completion of moves can be notated as "#" (some use "++" instead, but the USCF recommends "#"). Or the word mate is commonly used. Occasionally the double dagger is seen: "‡".
@OP: ivandh is correct, as to the symbol's usage. Most publications these days, as far as I've seen, use ++ to mean double check. This is a meaningless distinction, though, and monographs only use it trivially, merely to enlighten the reader to the fact that a double check has arisen in the position. Beyond this, double check does not matter: a check is a check, regardless of whether it's "double." That is why Chess.com does not use ++ in the move lists whenever a double check occurs.
As far as I can remember, ++ also used to mean checkmate, which also was already stated above. Indeed, this was how I was originally taught to write a checkmating move.
In MCO-10, + meant a distinct superiority and ++ meant a winning advantage.
I haven't seen that usage in a long time.
I had a wierd thought about double check... I have never seen that in notation...
# this is checkmate....i am gonna guess double check for the ++
double plus ungood
I have always used ++ for double check, and # for checkmate. It's fairly good notation I think.
which, like all double negatives, means really really good.
Orwell wasn't too specific, so we need to take the meaning out of the context.
according to page 218 of the US Chess Federation's Official Rules of Chess 5th Edition http://www.uscfsales.com/product_p/b0012rh.htm
the "++" means checkmate.
What do they say the notation is for double check?
Nah, those were what I mean.
++ is checkmate, + is check or double check
the book doesn't give a notation for double check.
um, there was discussion going as to whether "++" meant double check or checkmate. I just thought I'd see what the official rule book for the USCF says about it and post that." btw, the USCF is the governing body of chess in American and they are affiliated with FIDE, the governing body of chess around the world.
"MVL vs Svidler Classical Match Highlights with GMs Yermolisnky and Dlugy"
DGT chessboard + Fritz
by sergey_27 a few minutes ago
1 prize, car 2016 - Cadillac CTS-V
by AClearSky a few minutes ago
My Blitz match against GM Joey
by Trevor-D a few minutes ago
7/30/2016 - Saric - Malisauskas, European Team Championship 20
by gordstaylor 2 minutes ago
by ChessOfPlayer 5 minutes ago
No computer can solve this mate in 1, my revenge!!
by jackwu 6 minutes ago
King's Indian Vs. Nimzo Indian
by Justs99171 6 minutes ago
Metrics are great but can they be expanded?
by Martin_Stahl 7 minutes ago
2007 is just a number....
by TheBlunderfulPlayer 15 minutes ago
Best way to learn chess openings?
by eaguiraud 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!