20347 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The last version of Lucas Chess that I tried was 7.02, and I only VERY briefly looked at it. My biggest turnoff was the apparent lack of documentation. Is there a doc file somewhere (maybe in a newer version) that I've missed? (I haven't tried the videos, do they help?)
I just looked at the output of a sample game from the Chess.com analysis and I guess the 'score' the OP is looking for is the totals of; inaccuracies; mistakes; and blunders? Hmm, analysis strength states only 2200 too. No game references included. Couldn't one just add up the ?! (inaccuracies), ? (mistakes), and ?? (blunders) of any analysis and get a 'score'?
>>>Couldn't one just add up the ?! (inaccuracies), ? (mistakes), and ?? (blunders) of any analysis and get a 'score'? Yes, and that is just what I want. I want this for games which I haven't played on Chess.Com.>>>Isn't the fact you won or gained rating points the performance of that particular game.No, that's a different matter altogether.Thanks for the help so far guys, I've downloaded Lucas Chess and it might do what I want nicely when I've figured it all out and have the time to work through some games.I wonder what Chess.Com uses to do its assessment?Steve
Re: Lucas ChessI don't quite understand these "points." For example, the anlysis option "Is considered wrong move when the loss of points is greater than:" is set to 50 by default. What is that? I'm looking at a positon and I've got the kibitzer on and it gives evaluations of this position as "238 upperbound" or "266 lowerbound." Again, what is that? Is the engine's evaluation being converted into "points" and if so, is there a way to change the display so it just shows the actual engine's evaluation?
Yes, that's all configurable. I always use the latest development versions, so I'm never sure whether the features I have match what most people probably download. If you want the latest version that I'm using you can get it by going to his blog. At the bottom of each "step" version post you can grab the latest one. I just get the portable one.
You can convert the "points" that it shows by default by just dividing by 100. 238 = 2.38. I'm pretty sure it shows it relative to the side to move and not white all the time, too. You can change both of those, again, in the latest version at least, to what you are used to seeing (which I have done in my screenshot above).
I just used print screen and pasted into ms paint to get the screenshot, btw.
And yeah, Lucas Chess is fantastic.
Switch to new chess.com automatically
by Martin_Stahl a few minutes ago
by Destroyer_Mark_1420 a few minutes ago
Chess.com worst website on the internet
by batgirl 4 minutes ago
Lies In Chess
by Strangemover 6 minutes ago
8/27/2016 - Alexander Hildebrand, Springaren, 1951
by baba_a 9 minutes ago
What do you play against 1.e4?
by ChessOfPlayer 10 minutes ago
Resourcefulness In The Kitchen!
by ChessOfPlayer 13 minutes ago
Wich is the most easy Sizilian Variation with little Theory as Black
by Fireline11 15 minutes ago
What People Do When They Loose
by Destroyer_Mark_1420 15 minutes ago
Where's he from?
by notmtwain 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!