who has deeper chess understanding

  • #21
    waffllemaster wrote:
    When Magnus plays a simple position what kind of position is his opponent playing?

    lol...touche!

  • #22
    waffllemaster wrote:
    superking500 wrote:
    AndyClifton wrote:
    superking500 wrote:
    what if aronian, kramnik, etc. adapted his style, they would just be as good as magnus, am i right?

    You mean the Really Really Strong Style? lol

    yes for example aronian tends to play complex middle games....which is why he loses more then magnus....what if he played like magnus's style...he would be just as good as him

     

    magnus tends to play more simple posistionswel

    When Magnus plays a simple position what kind of position is his opponent playing?

    well in aronian's case a complex posistion, but im saying if aronian changed to magnus more simpler style, he would just  as good as magnus

  • #23
    superking500 wrote:
    waffllemaster wrote:
    superking500 wrote:
    AndyClifton wrote:
    superking500 wrote:
    what if aronian, kramnik, etc. adapted his style, they would just be as good as magnus, am i right?

    You mean the Really Really Strong Style? lol

    yes for example aronian tends to play complex middle games....which is why he loses more then magnus....what if he played like magnus's style...he would be just as good as him

     

    magnus tends to play more simple posistionswel

    When Magnus plays a simple position what kind of position is his opponent playing?

    well in aronian's case a complex posistion, but im saying if aronian changed to magnus more simpler style, he would just  as good as magnus

    No, what you're saying is blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah please someone respond to one of my posts.

    And because you make 10 a day, you usually get at least a few.

  • #24
    waffllemaster wrote:
    superking500 wrote:
    waffllemaster wrote:
    superking500 wrote:
    AndyClifton wrote:
    superking500 wrote:
    what if aronian, kramnik, etc. adapted his style, they would just be as good as magnus, am i right?

    You mean the Really Really Strong Style? lol

    yes for example aronian tends to play complex middle games....which is why he loses more then magnus....what if he played like magnus's style...he would be just as good as him

     

    magnus tends to play more simple posistionswel

    When Magnus plays a simple position what kind of position is his opponent playing?

    well in aronian's case a complex posistion, but im saying if aronian changed to magnus more simpler style, he would just  as good as magnus

    No, what you're saying is blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah blah please someone respond to one of my posts.

    And because you make 10 a day, you usually get at least a few.

     

    is it not true that aronian plays more complex posistions then magnus

     

    so logic would prevail if he played magnus style he would be just as strong as him

  • #25
    AndyClifton wrote:
    waffllemaster wrote:
    When Magnus plays a simple position what kind of position is his opponent playing?

    lol...touche!

    A complex one, obivously! Haven't you been listening to what superking has been saying? Magnus wins because he has a simple position, while his oppnent has a complex one.

  • #26
    macer75 wrote:
    AndyClifton wrote:
    waffllemaster wrote:
    When Magnus plays a simple position what kind of position is his opponent playing?

    lol...touche!

    A complex one, obivously! Haven't you been listening to what superking has been saying? Magnus wins because he has a simple position, while his oppnent has a complex one.

    stop with the sarcasm..please.... tell me what is flawed about my argument...if other GM played like magnus they would be just as strong as him (his style)

  • #27

    Factly, if Aronian play in the really, really strong style that AndyClifton refer to, then Aronian would do really, really well (good as Carlsen) as long as he not make really, really big mistake.

  • #28

    is sapientdust mocking me

  • #29

    No, not mocking anybody, just continuing a riff ;-)

  • #30

    lets just put it this way magnus tends to play it safe aiming for a slight positional/endgame advantage which he could and usually does convert to a win. Aronian on the other hand tends to play complex games hoping for a knockout punch. It doesnt mean he cant play ala carlsen but i belive carlsen positional understanding is superior to anybody thats why he wins on long positional games and his openings suits him well.

  • #31

    My guess would be Vladimir Kramnik

  • #32

    bump

  • #33
    sapientdust wrote:

    Factly, if Aronian play in the really, really strong style that AndyClifton refer to, then Aronian would do really, really well (good as Carlsen) as long as he not make really, really big mistake.

    Unfortunately, because he doesn't know that he really really needs to play in the really really strong style (probably because he's really really dumb), he play really really badly, and make really really bg mistake really really often. It's really a really big pity.

  • #34
    superking500 wrote:

    is sapientdust mocking me

    I certainly hope so.

  • #35

    I think this thread could give one a complex.Undecided

  • #36

    It's making me break out (hm, I wonder what color my rash'll be?).

  • #37

    Uhoh I think your nose is turning orange.

    Surprised

  • #38

    It's actually a giant pimiento.

or Join

Online Now