14143 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I was curious if there is a way to quickly tell who the winningest human player here is on Chess.com. I'll say a minimum of 50 games and the player has to have played atleast more than one type of here. I would love to see just how good some of these players are here compared to the rest of us, without experiencing it first hand...lol
Does anyone have any ideas of who this would be?
You've been duped. You may want to reread my post and then give a proper answer. If you don't,I don't care.
It's a confusing post..
The best '' real-human '' players usually genuine chess-professionals eg: Natalia Pogononina? But hasn't played 50-games yet I don't think...
I was saying I edited it, after seeing the oversite. I meant of the people who have. Titled players, who come here, but don't play here, don't count.
But how do we know they're human?
The first rule about fight club is, you aren't allowed to talk about fight club...
I played a guy who had some 1000 games under his belt, carmin or something like that, I asked him how he aquired so many games and he said he was disabled and just stayed home and played the whole day (and night) he was also an insomniac. Not sure if he is still here or not.
i play a lot and im approaching the 2000 game mark. its not very hard to get a lot of games under your belt.
Wow that is very good! I been here 17 months and only have 350 or so, so 1000 and 2000 sound like a lot. I will try to look up carmin to see if my estimate is correct...
Yep school first, that's always a good policy.
Chess will always be here, so you're smart putting school first!
What does Nameno1had think of this?
I once had an old man tell I would have to lose 1000 games before I would be a good chess player. I dont even know if I've ever played 500. I am more particularly looking to find the best overall player I can, who plays 960 and online chess. I want to study their games. I am not particularly interested in just studying titled players games. Everyone else does that. I am looking for some hidden things.
1 e4 d5 2 anything other than exd5
by Veganomnomnom a few minutes ago
castling should be banned, explanation inside
by macer75 4 minutes ago
Any benefit of getting better at chess?
by baddogno 5 minutes ago
2/9/2016 - Tempo Time
by Soccerface 8 minutes ago
The New Chess.com Review/ Feedback
by DoOrDie71 13 minutes ago
QGA queen-side counter-gambit
by newengland7 15 minutes ago
How Long Will Anand Stand?
by AussieRookie 20 minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Missing The Obvious
by MasterMatthew52 21 minutes ago
This $3.00 endgame book is better than Fundamental Chess ENdings
by hhnngg1 22 minutes ago
Fundemental chess ending 1
by CJD26 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!