You Should be Force to Delete Your Chess.com Account

  • #21

    He is definitely sounded like monster_with_no_name.

  • #22

    I dont want other people to want people to not want people to delete their accounts, and I mean that.

  • #23

    you mean you want his account deleted? I think I followed it this time. 

  • #24
    kco wrote:

    He is definitely sounded like monster_with_no_name.

    They do seem to have suffered similar head trauma, but monster was a bit more frantic, you could almost see the flecks of spittle flying from his mouth as he sat on the edge of his chair, typing with furious intensity.

    I suspect peter is just a parody of monster.  Whatever his intent, he certainly used the right bait.

  • #25
    Ubik42 wrote:
    falcogrine wrote:

    could you please restate whatever you feel strongly about? the commas create many different possible meanings

    Ok its probably better if I do it using abstract representative logic.

    Let A = people who want to force other people to delete their account.

    Let X = people who propose rule changes including rule changes regarding closure of account

    Let B = all other people who want accounts closed.

    Let C = Everyone who does not want anyone to want to close people's account (regardless of whether the accounts actually get closed or not)

    Let D = Everyone who does not want the accounts closed.

    Let E = Anyone who does not want everyone to want to close the accounts of people who suggest accounts should always remain open.

    Then, [A mod X = (B+E*(D-C))^2] * (B+C+(DQ*))

    Q = the moving rating average of people who do not want players to want other players to close accounts.

    I hope stating it in algebraic form clarifies things.

     

    I don't see how it could be made clearer.

  • #26

    I think its spelled Gordon Gekko.

  • #27

    I think I need a drink.

  • #28

    So...that's what gg stands for.

  • #29

    Finally a suggestion I can agree with!  Thanks OP Laughing

  • #30
    cookiemonster161140 wrote:
    Estragon wrote:
    Ubik42 wrote:
    falcogrine wrote:

    could you please restate whatever you feel strongly about? the commas create many different possible meanings

    Ok its probably better if I do it using abstract representative logic.

    Let A = people who want to force other people to delete their account.

    Let X = people who propose rule changes including rule changes regarding closure of account

    Let B = all other people who want accounts closed.

    Let C = Everyone who does not want anyone to want to close people's account (regardless of whether the accounts actually get closed or not)

    Let D = Everyone who does not want the accounts closed.

    Let E = Anyone who does not want everyone to want to close the accounts of people who suggest accounts should always remain open.

    Then, [A mod X = (B+E*(D-C))^2] * (B+C+(DQ*))

    Q = the moving rating average of people who do not want players to want other players to close accounts.

    I hope stating it in algebraic form clarifies things.

     

    I don't see how it could be made clearer.

    But is that ELO or glicko?

    Or Gordon Gecko?

    I am trying to keep it simple and you are needlessly complicating it.

  • #31

    Welcome back...I  thought you were giving chess up.

    Maybe the clarity of my post made you realize chess helps prevent confusion.

  • #32

    "chess is clarity" - falcogrine

  • #33
    falcogrine wrote:
    EricFleet wrote:

    If you suggest changing the rules of chess, you should delete your chess.com account and create your own chess website.

     

    Discuss.

    if you have more than 5 posts supporting changing the rules for over 2 days, your account should be deleted.

    lol good one

  • #34

    thanks!

or Join

Online Now