x
Chess - Play & Learn

Chess.com

FREE - In Google Play

FREE - in Win Phone Store

VIEW

can u solve it-mate in 2 step

  • #21
    k-scope wrote:
    Cnacnel wrote:
    k-scope wrote:

    with the revised position (#15) it is now mate in 2.

    No, it's not. It's still mate in 3.

    in 2.

    True.

Top

Online Now