Forums

can u solve it-mate in 2 step

Sort:
C-nack
C-nack
Feb 6, 2013
0
#21
k-scope wrote:
Cnacnel wrote:
k-scope wrote:

with the revised position (#15) it is now mate in 2.

No, it's not. It's still mate in 3.

in 2.

True.

Forums
Hot Topics
Unanswered
Most Recent
improving is impossible
Joe_The_winner
Why was 1.e4 so popular at the recent candidates tournament?
CastPo
what’s the average IQ of a regular chess player
dennisobie
😎Can you beat the person above you in bullet😎
MaetsNori
a game I just won wasn't properly recorded as such
AutisticCath
Magnus - did he bail too early?
protestant_anti_vacciner
CHESS IN MOVIES
long_quach
Just for fun - Ranking black’s responses to 1. e4
CastPo
Queenside Majority Openings
Uhohspaghettio1
after 1330 games, is it normal to still be slightly over 1,000 rated only?
Ziryab
Forum Legend
Following
New Comments
Locked Topic
Pinned Topic