Yet, you're trying to make a statment, be it as it may, with pictures. As you have nothing else!
Did you not say "I finally figured out the real purpose of this thread; making physicists cry." Why dont you elaborate?
nothing to see here
Sort:
SirVicious wrote:
Why dont you elaborate?
Because I'm not here to make any points or prove anything, but to have fun.
(Although I did in fact cry a tiny bit after reading the post, so it might make sense that someone who's devoted more time to physics would cry more.)
It's all good,,,i'm not a physicist. I am under the influence of rum & coke. I am just trying to stir things up a little! If you heard me saying these things. You wouldnt take any of it seriously. ...i dont, in fact, im not even sure i believe anything that i have said.
lol funny stuff
corrijean wrote:
I think lifespan is most often related to the size of the creature, not the length of time a planet takes to revolve around the sun.
On earth yes, but imagine if there were life on mercury and we were to go there, wouldnt our lifespan be longer than the inhabitants there, what would be a year to them would be a fraction of a year to us. Just a theory that has been debated by scholars.
Aug 27, 2011
0
#827
soldierpiper wrote:
Mushrooms are always in the dark & always full of shit.
LOVED THE PIC!
KeViN246 wrote:
lol good point corrijean. new planet between mars and jupiter. nice. that explains them downgrading pluto to a moon. got to keep it at nine :) fricken nasa bastards
Actually the sumerians depicted 12 planets and placed them all correctly 6000 years ago. The 9 we know of plus nibiru also the sun and the moon were included creating the pantheon of 12.
SirVicious wrote:
KeViN246 wrote:
Bex1p wrote:
SirVicious wrote:
The odds of intelligent life not existing in great numbers throughout the universe are very realistically one in an inconceivable number.
Take a look at this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pumapunku
This ancient temple is at least 5000 years old. And, could be,however unlikely, nearly 10,000 years old(the end of the last ice age).Thus, it is as old(probably much older)as the pyramids of giza. But, the stones used here are not granite. They are -diorite- (harder than steel). One of which weighs an estimated 131 METRIC TONS....LOL. Rap you mind around that; i dont think so! And, these stones are cut with a level of precision far superior to the pyramids. Precision which could not be duplicated by modern diamond technology. It would be impossible to reproduce pumapunku with modern technology. Yet, somehow, stone age people managed to successfully accomplish it during the neolithic period.
Exactly my point, thank you for the ray of light.
isnt there an equation out there? think i saw it once. number of planets in the universe/number of habitable planets/ chance of producing intelligent life/ chance of that intelligent life not destroying itself/chance of that intelligent life advancing to a stage of technology able to leave their planet
something like that
then add into the equation the ability to go faster than the speed of light to travel to other solar systems thousands of light years away
not very likely sorry to say
more likely the neolithic guys had a genius stone cutter or at least a very patient one
An equation? Not that I know of. There are rough estimates of the number of potential stars within the cosmic particle horizon. But they are based on other estimates such as mass density and are not very reliable. The cosmic particle horizon(the edge of the visible universe) does not contain,by any stretch of the imagination,the entire universe.
The equation was something about the number of stars, those that have planets, those that have planets in the "goldilocks zone" and those that have water.
I forget the details but it pointed out that it would be impossible for intelligent life to not be out there. How ignorant of mankind to believe that we are somehow special in this vast universe and that there could not be life out there, those that believe that could not possibly consider the views expressed here.
Aug 27, 2011
0
#830
in my line of work life span depends on what u eat, how well you exercise and how fast the trauma team gets to you when you fall off Elenin !
SirVicious wrote:
"add into the equation the ability to go faster than the speed of light to travel to other solar systems thousands of light years away".
Not exactly, it was actually proven(almost a hundred years ago) that motion is not even necessary for traveling a given distance(time is relative and velocity=distance/time). It has also experimentally been proven that the entire universe exists in many different places at the same time;wave-particle duality is an example. Are these things that you understand?
Besides, regardless of whether or not extraterrestrials are visiting earth. You are not going to explain how hunter gatherers were transporting and cutting diorite stones weighing 131 metric tons. Evidence suggests contrary to your beliefs!
Some of the stones used at baalbeck were around 1000 tons. These stones are impossible to move now! Never mind that though, once these stones were quarried, dressed and transported sometimes 100s of miles and often hauled up mountains and across bodies of water, the knowledge of the solar system was needed to align these monuments to the stars creating in affect calenders that would predict celestial motion for thousands of years to come. All of this by stone age man? i think not.
rooperi wrote:
I can just imagine those poor scared Annunaki on NIbiru:
OMG! there's a new planet between Mars and Venus! Let's call it Earth. And the beings who live there are called humans. And they are responsible for everything we can't explain!
You have that all the wrong way around, im not gonna bother to explain further, back of the class lol.
SirVicious wrote:
Maybe they're not from another planet. Perhaps they have been here all along.
They are from nibiru, they have been here since long before mankind, close to 500,000 years now. As i have said this is all documented in an autobiographical way, without these autobiographical texts the sumerians would have never have known about the solar system to mention just one aspect, we have now corroborated and confirmed nearly everything the sumerians knew 6000 years ago.
SirVicious wrote:
oinquarki wrote:
SirVicious wrote:
it was actually proven(almost a hundred years ago) that motion is not even necessary for traveling a given distance(time is relative and velocity=distance/time). It has also experimentally been proven that the entire universe exists in many different places at the same time;wave-particle duality is an example. Are these things that you understand?
I finally figured out the real purpose of this thread; making physicists cry.
Go ahead, enlighten me! When was it? The eclipse of 1916? When light from a distant star was shown to be bent by the suns gravity. In fact it was the space that was being bent.
Talk to us a little about it quarky! While you're at it, tell us a little about the double slit experiment! And, what it means! Oh, and tell us about schrodingers and heisenbergs equations. And what they mean!
Tell me the relationship between these -two- equations. f=ma and e=mc^2... How does "c" affect "a"? And how does this affect v=d/t?
BTW, did you know,that if you could come to a complete stop with respect to the cosmic background radiation. You would be moving with a velocity well over a million miles per hour,with respect to the universe? In reallity,you could not distiguish whether you or the universe was in motion!
Didnt think so! Motion can only be defined in terms of an arbitrarily designated frame of reference. There are, in all probability, many places throughout the universe. Where light-years could be traversed instantly;without motion and without time.
Wow!
SirVicious wrote:
corrijean wrote:
Yes. The universe. Plus, most organisms are pretty equivalent in complexity to humans.
The known universe doesn’t even come close to the complexity of the mind which perceives it. Nothing conceivable to the human mind can exceed the complexity of the human mind.
Anyway,there is more evidence to suggest extraterrestrials have visited earth. Than there is evidence of the existence of Jesus or Muhammad! In fact,there is no real evidence at all to suggest that Jesus ever existed. Yet, most are willing to believe this nonsense!
I am by no means a christian or even religious but i do believe jesus existed, i also believe that he was a hybrid.
SirVicious wrote:
Lets face it! If you had any idea what you were talking about. We would be debating right now. The fact is, we're not. Because you dont! Instead,your posting pictures!
Here here, quarki has already been exposed as a buffoon with next to no knowledge on the subject yet he insists on sticking his nose in, like a wasp in the beer.
KeViN246 wrote:
lol piper youre funny Im homosexual. My mom is hot btw. you owe her some money for last night. She has your change for a dollar? i know shes on the dole, But shes hungry. Can she keep the change :)
Sure Kevin ,Im feeling generous I ll bring me friends so she can work on them & make a few bucks .
Aug 27, 2011
0
#838
Bex1p wrote:
corrijean wrote:
I think lifespan is most often related to the size of the creature, not the length of time a planet takes to revolve around the sun.
On earth yes, but imagine if there were life on mercury and we were to go there, wouldnt our lifespan be longer than the inhabitants there, what would be a year to them would be a fraction of a year to us. Just a theory that has been debated by scholars.
How do you figure that out ?
Using your logic all species on earth would have the same lifespan.
Aug 27, 2011
0
#839
Bex1p wrote:
KeViN246 wrote:
lol good point corrijean. new planet between mars and jupiter. nice. that explains them downgrading pluto to a moon. got to keep it at nine :) fricken nasa bastards
Actually the sumerians depicted 12 planets and placed them all correctly 6000 years ago. The 9 we know of plus nibiru also the sun and the moon were included creating the pantheon of 12.
So what about Ceres Haumea, Makemake and Eris
where do they fit into this 12?
Lets face it! If you had any idea what you were talking about. We would be debating right now. The fact is, we're not. Because you dont!
This is ironic because I'm not talking about anything.