Also, I’d like to take the time to say this:
Since temperatures are rising 0.1 degrees every 100 years, and Antarctica is below 50 degrees, that means it would take an increase in temperature of 82 degrees. An increase of 82 degrees given the current rate of increase would be this:
82^1000=82000
Thats 82,000 years for Antarctica to begin melting.
It won't necessarily be a linear change though, because it can be a bit like compound interest in that some small change creates different conditions that increase the rate of melting and so on.
Even then, it would have to be increasing it’s rate extremely rapidly to even have an effect fairly soon.
It isn't going to have a full effect "soon" but certainly, things like the Greenland ice, parts of the North Polar floating ice and icebergs are very much under threat, because the sea foms a warming system, since currents exist. So we are going to see some change and some of that change is going to be bad. How bad it gets may not affect us for decades though.
The reason why these alarmists are getting strident is that governments are really slow and bad at co-operating and making plans even for the very near future. They tend to be reactive only. The proof of that is all the wars ... the First and Second World Wars were both preventable. Especially the second, which was probably completely caused by the Geneva Convention. That means it was caused by France and and the USA as much as by Germany. Not by the UK, which argued that the Geneva Convention WOULD have that outcome.
Transportation is one of the largest contributors to global warming, at 21%. Road transport accounts for three quarters of this.
Here is a pie chart of US emissions from a few years ago.