Man walked on the moon.
And you actually believe this ?
Conspiracy Theory: What's yours ?
Sort:
Unicorns actually do exist.
Sep 17, 2016
0
#4
Hey! .. How about, allotting, $50-to-$100 million, taxpayer's $$.. to get to 'the bottom' of this! [ ;
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/19/malibu-underwater-alien-base_n_5493186.html
Sep 17, 2016
0
#5
Recent, 'Chinese' video, of an alleged, 'alien' moon base.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YUqEXNtApuE
A conspiracy theory is an idea about reality that can be right or wrong, but is not endorsed by the establishment including the official media. To be accepted as "fact" in the sense the OP means it, means to be vocalised by officialdom.
To use it in the modern sense, my favourite "conspiracy theory" is that 9/11 was an inside job. It's such a shame most people are just sheep. it's unforgivable for intelligent people not to look into this.
Sep 17, 2016
0
#7
That's partly because, few people in 'Congress' are willing to 'take on' that subject, out of legitimate Fear, for their own {physical}, safety!
If one finds this hard-to-believe; Consider, that the 'US' gov't, has approximately, '2 dozen' separate 'intelligence' agencies..{with, 100,000 or so, employees} - That collectively have, an annual $25 billion.. {or there-abouts], 'budget' - And, All-of-them, allowing, a segment of their personel, to carry 'weapons'.. {'concealed' if need be}.. to 'protect' themselves, against potential-and-perceived, 'hostile elements'!
In-a-word.. Signifigant portions, of our federal beaurocracy {sp?}, are 'built' on Fear- based, assumptions! -- Even, suspected 'ET' ufos - Ie., 'Shoot'.. to see if they're 'friendly'. ] ;
The 9/11 conspiracy theory is not far fetched. Probably destined to go the way of Kennedys assassination. Covered up as the truth is far worse than any speculation.
The book that dropped the bombshell on the history of "natural selection".
By Mike Sutton.
Just as new DNA analysis is changing traditional forensic science I recently pioneered the use of newly available “big data” analysis of the literature to expose the world’s greatest science fraud.
The great science myth, started by Darwin and Wallace, that they each ‘independently discovered the theory of natural selection with no prior knowledge of Patrick Matthew’s earlier publication of the entire detailed theory was completely disproved by big data analysis in 2014.
Darwin and Wallace claimed that they failed to hear of Matthew’s book because no naturalist known to them had read it. They lied! But for 154 years the scientific community, simply took their word for it in contravention of the most famous ancient Latin tenet of the Royal Society ‘Nullius in Verba‘ (on the word alone of no one) .
Contrary to current Darwinian “knowledge” that no one read Matthew’s book, pioneering big data analysis of 30 million+ publications reveals that before Darwin penned the ‘Origin of Species’ at least 52 people read Matthew’s (1831) book ‘On Naval Timber and Arboriculture’, 25 actually cited it in the published literature! Moreover, 19 of those who read it were in Darwin’s inner social circle! Of the seven naturalists now newly known to have cited Matthew’s book in print, three played pivotal roles at the epicentre of Darwin’s and Wallace’s published and unpublished work on natural selection before the ‘Origin of Species’ was first published in 1859.
Knowledge contamination from Matthew to Darwin and Wallace is thus uniquely proven in ‘Nullius in Verba: Darwin’s greatest secret’ – the ground-breaking book, which 100 per cent proves that Matthew influenced both Darwin and Wallace through three major naturalist who cited his 1831 book: John Loudon, Prideaux John Selby and Robert Chambers.
Fully 27 years before Darwin’s Origin of Specis was first published, Loudon reviewed Matthew’s book in 1832, writing precisely that it had something original to say on “the origin of species” no less! Loudon then went on to edit and publish Blyth’s highly influential papers of 1835 and 1837! Chambers cited Matthew’s book in 1832 before penning the famous ‘Vestiges of Creation’ in 1844. And both Darwin and Wallace admitted the huge influence of Robert Chambers’s ‘Vestiges of Creation’ on their own work in the field of natural selection. Selby, who cited Matthew’s book many times in 1842 went on to edit and publish Wallace’s famous Sarawak paper of 1855!
‘Nullius’ further proves that Darwin told six deliberate lies in order to achieve primacy over Matthew and reveals for the first time his desperate attempt to have the codified rules of scientific priority changed so that better known scientists such as he would be awarded priority over lesser known first discoverers such as Matthew. Moreover, all eight of Darwin’s excuses for why he supposedly had no prior-knowledge of Matthew’s prior-published discovery are all proven to be completely fallacious.
Having destroyed the myth of Darwin the honest gentleman of science, ‘Nullius’ examines further new bombshell discoveries in light of earlier discoveries of Darwin’s dishonesty in stealing the ideas, given in confidence, of his Edinburgh tutor, Grant, and his notorious editing of the second edition of the ‘Voyages of the Beagle’, which fuelled the myth that he discovered natural selection on the Galapagos Islands rather than a year or two later where he really found it – inside books between 1837 and 1838.
If you think Galapagos finch beaks had anything at all to do with the discovery of natural selection then you, like millions of others, have been hoodwinked by Darwin’s great science fraud.
Did you know that evolution theory has never reviewed one scrap of evidence, and that all the supposed missing links are hoaxes?
Sep 17, 2016
0
#11
Animals are really aliens and big food industry have us eat them so they won't evolve (evolution isn't real btw) into reptilian overlords (but they are the good kind that's why big gov wants us to eat them). Big brother is worried because of the dissent in big food. Big food has been replacing the the meat with fake meat (see pink slime scandal) and actually saving the alien animals and storing them in secret bunkers under walmart. The animal aliens (but not the greys because they are the bad aliens) and the scientologists are actually the good guys. If you give Tom Cruise enough money you can escape before the coming nuclear apocalypse set up by the greys and big pharma on "The Arc 2.0" a cold fusion spaceship that is currently being held in area 53 a super secret airforce base run by hipsters in williamsburg new york city. Illuminati is not real but is a shadow conspiracy set up by Tom Cruise in order to distract big oil from the real cause. Stay strong my brothers and don't forget that if they take me away the detonation codes are stored in
That aliens exist, and is being covered up, is there any greater conspiracy?
If an alien announced his presence to the world, what would be the consequences to you personally?
When Fischer went into refuge, he took Tupac with him and lost him in the woods.
Teslajr wrote:
Did you know that evolution theory has never reviewed one scrap of evidence, and that all the supposed missing links are hoaxes?
Yes. I Knew this.
Missing links are a hoax. They do not exist. Feeble attempts at a "proof" to perpetuate a myth.
Sep 17, 2016
0
#17
The Winds Execute message. Ruined a few careers (eg: Safford) and we still never got to the bottom of it.
Fischer went to Iceland.
Lost Tupac in the woods?
I'm at a loss.
PlayChessPoorly wrote:
Oh no! Someone should check on that guy!
A complete internet search as been made. You are not certifiable, but the subject remains open. :)
Play chess !
Good luck and always a handshake.
Gotta love a good conspiracy theory.
The latest is Hillary's body double, even that she died on 9/11 !
What was once a conspiracy theory and is now accepted as fact ?