Grammar Cop: "it's, its"

Sort:
Avatar of changoviejo

I kant get 'round that speling of consonant.

Avatar of BobbyChesspickles
Consonant
Avatar of Pulpofeira

"Cop", damn, I was physically attacked by my English theacher for using such a word once.

Avatar of BobbyChesspickles
teacher
Avatar of Pulpofeira

That was a typo, hopefully it wouldn't involve physical violence.

Avatar of lofina_eidel_ismail
KantWasWrong wrote:
batgirl wrote:

What about 'tis?

Archaic but acceptable. 'Tis a contraction of "it is."

i always thought "'tis" was "this"

interesting thread.......

Avatar of StairwayToTruth
wanmokewan wrote:

First: but*.  Butt is the rear end of something.

Second: A word starting with Y is a consenant sound, thus "a" is appropriate.

First: I'm disappointed that this is the only mistake you found in my question. It hurt me to write it as I did, so please try again.

Second: Consonant*

Avatar of KantWasWrong
lofina_eidel_ismail wrote:
KantWasWrong wrote:
batgirl wrote:

What about 'tis?

Archaic but acceptable. 'Tis a contraction of "it is."

i always thought "'tis" was "this"

interesting thread.......

Think of "'tis (it is) the season to be jolly..."

Avatar of StairwayToTruth
KantKanBeWrong wrote:
lofina_eidel_ismail wrote:
KantBeWrong wrote:
batgirl wrote:

What about 'tis?

Archaic but acceptable. 'Tis a contraction of "it is."

i always thought "'tis" was "this"

interesting thread.......

Think of "'tis (it is) the season to be jolly..."

 

Avatar of Babytigrrr

Grammar!!

Men write... Woman, without her man, is nothing.

Women write... Woman! Without her, man is nothing.

Avatar of StairwayToTruth

Woman, without! Her; man "i,s noth.in?g

Avatar of whatadisaster

Double negatives are a real no-no.

Avatar of whatadisaster

I am not unfamiliar with the word litotes.

Avatar of Babytigrrr
whatadisaster wrote:

Double negatives are a real no-no.

 

I see what you did t̶h̶e̶i̶r̶,̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶y̶'̶r̶e̶,̶ ̶ there.

Avatar of StairwayToTruth
Babyligrr wrote:
whatabrilliantwordplay wrote:

Double negatives are a real no-no.

 

I see what you did t̶h̶e̶i̶r̶,̶ ̶t̶h̶e̶y̶'̶r̶e̶,̶ ̶ there.

I didn't see it until you said that. Nice one.

Avatar of TheAuthority

Babytigrrr wrote:

I must admit, I am a sucker for good grammar.

 

My unsolicited grammar tip of the day: 'who' is for people and 'that' is for things...  eg. I have a friend who is cool and a dog that is clever.

----

I contend a dog is also a "who". I have a pen that is not clever.

Fun thread, thanks Kan.

Avatar of ANOK1

whotcha doin to the queens lingo talk proper like wot i do pleez

Avatar of KantWasWrong

Your welcome. There will be more in the future. I've tons of them!

Avatar of ANOK1

taint right all this fangling around chuff it im off the pub

Avatar of MarcoBR444

Out in the pasture the nature watcher watches the catcher.

While the catcher watches the pitcher who pitches the balls.

Whether the temperature's up or whether the temperature's down, the nature watcher, the catcher and the pitcher are always around.

The pitcher pitches, the catcher catches and the watcher watches.

So whether the temperature's rises or whether the temperature falls the nature watcher just watches the catcher who's watching the pitcher who's watching the balls.