hello Napa,
I do not know whether it is useful to limit the number of participants ..... Also applies to us. The fact that the opponents may be more, I do not think will affect your challenge. The team that has a person with high ratings, it can, only with this, fight opponents even if they were to be hundreds. Indeed, in my opinion, the more is the most disadvantage because all votes are worth the same and not always agrees with whoever has the highest rating if it does not explain all of its proposed move. Often we tend to watch and vote for the obvious move. I think it's more useful to act in a sort of rules of procedure where it is determined how to vote but also when to start voting. In practice I think it is more useful to empower a team leader (you) who decides, among the many proposals that have been launched to vote,the best move and then vote on it, the rest of the team.
Andrea
PS: Sorry for my english
Hey fellas,
I wanted to share with you guys something that has been bothering me since I joined chess.com (under the name Floyyd, 2 years ago):
When I create a Vote Chess game, it's either I create an open challenge that anyone can accept, or I need to find a specific team and send the invite, without knowing if they will accept or not. For us to be able to play more Vote Chess without the frustration of playing against a team 20 times bigger, could you guys allow us to use 2 filters to chose the minimum and maximum number of members of the teams who can accept the challenge? Kind of like when we chose the min and max level in correspondance chess when creating an open challenge.
If you like the idea, please let us know!
Cheers,
Greg