20169 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I have had different opinions around this topic.
Positive: It increases the speed at which children can calculate and arrive at a good move.
Negative: If played frequently the children can start avoiding comprehensive thinking before making a move.
Your thoughts please.
I agree with your positive and negative assertions, but I think they should be introduced to blitz and should be able to choose whatever type of chess they wish to play. Whatever makes it fun and interesting for them
Raghav8, your concerns are valid. Depending on the age of children I would limit the amount of blitz played as it develops bad habits such as quick thinking and dependence upon openings.
I think that a combination of all kinds of chess would be most beneficial for them but would probably limit blitz, as it is the most attractive form of chess.
As an elementary student, I dislike blitz,I find it has enforced more rushed and careless move making in normal games.
my chess life...
age 4: learned to play chess
age 6: chess club (elementary)
age 10 - present: BLITZ + Tournaments
I have found that both quick games and computer chess induce carelessness in my children, however I play many quick games with them so that they develop a "feel" for different types of openings and immediate recognition of tactical opportunities.
In my experience, little children always play blitz, even with half an hour on the clock. They really need to be persuaded to slow down and more importantly, they need a reason to think. If you stress it too much they may become slower, but they won't actually think about the position. This type of deep thinking is usually seen quite late, around age 10 and up.
I think you can only offer blitz and slower games, offer the right instructions and hope they slow down on their own.
Dutchday, you make a good point. In addition, they seem to enjoy a quicker game and it is important that they enjoy chess at ages 5 & 7 or they will not want to keep learning.
I have recently found that a good way to train careful thought is to have them do tactics problems, or they will look over my shoulder as I do them online. Then I walk them through some part of the combination and they will figure out the rest.
Hmm, im not entirely sure to be honest its a tough one. I agree with the positives and negatives mentioned, but i do think its more important that they do learn that comprehensive level.
I always played from blitz and i feel like its stunted my ability to improve. Obviously not completely but somewhat. Now im very impatient with long games so i need blitz. Also children are at there best learning age when young so its best to learn then rather than later.
Comprehensive chess is like the foundation, then they can build on that by moving into blitz and bullet etc :)
Just my opinion anyway :D
In my opinion Blitz is very interesting and develops tactics very well.
It depends on what your objectives are. Blitz might teach them that they do not need to think in order to play chess.
I don't think that kids (anyone) can play chess with out thinking. You have to think to make a legal move.
and yes I do know what you ment but you need to work on your choice of words
by Pulpofeira a few minutes ago
Test your Tactics! Ten tricky problems, can you go 10/10?
by abulqais 120 seconds ago
best effective book
by thegreat_patzer 3 minutes ago
Castling with the queen
by ThrillerFan 6 minutes ago
8/26/2016 - Kouatly - Tsheshkovsky, Hoogovens 1988
by Kozik1 8 minutes ago
FIDE vs CHESS. COM rating
by GMJAS 8 minutes ago
A selection of fiendish endgame studies
by KasparovLjubljana 10 minutes ago
Does most of the world really love the stalemate factor?
by Lasker1900 10 minutes ago
Has a king move ever delivered checkmate (in a serious game?)
by Ubzugajir 13 minutes ago
[No naming and shaming - Mod] behavior
by Diakonia 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!