16731 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Is there some reason why people are listed unde Great Britain and United Kingdom as separate entities? People can also list themselves as members from the constituent nations that are part of the United Kingdom (the Disunited Kingdom) if they choose. From a purely statistical standpoint, this makes a who-is-from-where tracking difficult.
Not that it's particularly, earth-shatteringly important...I'm just curious.
This guy thinks its important...
Well, then why do you think it is important that England, Wales,The United Kingdom and Great Britain have four separate listings? Together they would have 192,000 members, making them the second largest entity after the USA. It just produces a weird statistical anomaly.
The U.S. was split 6 ways in the World League ...
Masterful_Forfeit wrote: momijigari, I'm afraid that if we don't split the US up, it will have a horrendously unbalanced advantage over the competition.
to balance up their numerical dominance - which didn't please everyone -
momijigari wrote: USA team doesn't need to be splitted in parts.
And if it does, I'm affraid, Ukraine won't join the league. Such a league won't be «legitimate» in my point of view. All we want is teams representing counties, that's it. We already have a thousands of groups representing whatever they want to.
but by appearing smaller - Britain avoided this fate.
'Eagles may soar high, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.'
Why did you say that? It seems that he is only asking a question. One can either ask questions or remain eternally unaware. To me, he chose to learn.
No their were Americans like myself and 5 others.
" The Call of the Wild with IM Danny Rensch!"
why engine in suggesting h4 on move 6?
by Fiveofswords a few minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Missing The Obvious
by HollowHorn 8 minutes ago
This $3.00 endgame book is better than Fundamental Chess ENdings
by SilentKnighte5 18 minutes ago
Regular chess game against the computer
by petterig 18 minutes ago
Did "Rapid Chess Improvement" by Michael de la Maza work for you?
by SilentKnighte5 21 minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Neumann-Hernandez Dresden 1969
by Ledgermayne1234 22 minutes ago
Who will win Candidates 2016
by Rational_Optimist 35 minutes ago
Interactive/comparative historical charts of top Fide players
by TurboFish 35 minutes ago
Withdrawing from Tournaments Accidentally
by Cevilchess 36 minutes ago
What's the most creative chess puzzle you've ever seen?
by Steikt 41 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!