21193 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
So why is he listed as top rated player from USA on this site with 2700 rating if he hasn't moved a piece over here?
Maybe he's busy?
may be the 90 day criterion applied to his games..(during non premium days)
Maybe he's rated OTB 2700? That shouldn't make a difference anyways.
based on what?
Here he is beating former world champion Veselin Topalov in a blindfold game. I believe he won the Tata Steel tournament last year ahead of Viswanathan Anand, Magnus Carlsen, Levon Aronian and Vladimir Kramnik. He does seem to have a lot of potential, doesn't he?
how these guys play blindfold... cant even imagine
How did he get a 1280 rating here? They used to start everyone off at 1200 but now i think new players are listed as unrated.
it is to be construed as the the average rating for all users with country listed "United States"
say one guy is 2700 on top and 1000 players 990 rated will give an average of 991
I meant to say, why is he listed as top rated player from USA with 2700 rating in online chess when he hasn't played a single online game. Why not put someone who has actually played on this site and got rating?
You'll note that the rating is in parentheses, which is just a guesstimate of a rating based on his USCF or FIDE rating. So for a chess.com rating, it should be about 3000.
Still, what's really disturbing is that the average US player on chess.com is rated 1280!!
Topalov was not world champion... classical only please...
From 1999-2004, the FIDE world championships were I believe held at a time control of 90 minutes for the first 40 moves, but the 2005 world championship in San Luis which Topalov won was held at a "classical" time control of 2 hours for the first 40 moves. Both Kramnik and Kasparov were sent invitations to play at San Luis, but declined.
I think NM reb here considers Topalov to be a world champion, but not the rapid knockout champions of 1999-2004.
Imho the policy of assigning titled players certain ratings upon registering is arguable, because:
a) FIDE ratings and Chess.com ratings are different
b) Correspondence chess and otb chess are different
c) The numbers assigned are pretty random. I think I got 2200 as a start; my second (a strong IM) was graded 2000. Then some people actually get confused and start asking: "Is it true that some amateur who has 2800 Chess.com rating is a better player than you"?
i remember reading somewhere in chess.com itself a computation/ratio of converting USCF rating to chess.com.. May be such a formulae exists for FIDE too.. but i am not sure..
He has another account
He should play speed chess against GMs!
[oh wait, he does!]
Bohemia Dog Knight Pieces from '50's or '60's
by cgrau a few minutes ago
Website completely broken
by Melayia 2 minutes ago
by TRextastic 9 minutes ago
alekhine 1.e4 Nf6 2.Nc3 Nxe4
by Strangemover 10 minutes ago
5/5/16 - Maya!!
by Robert_New_Alekhine 13 minutes ago
by Ryanian 17 minutes ago
by Ryanian 18 minutes ago
To many notifications
by Martin_Stahl 20 minutes ago
Binder Clips office depot chess set
by Strangemover 23 minutes ago
by Mirza12 25 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!