15748 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Just recently a number of thematic tournaments I am in started up their second/third rounds. Typically we get 1 or more people who withdraw/resign immediately or time out. Normally you would not gain rating points in this way. However since the tournament is thematic and starts after several moves are preset it seems to behave as thopugh we had actually started a game. So the game says moves = 0 but i still gain points. I gained 22 today alone and have had 8 such games in the last couple of weeks. Doesn't seem right.
perhaps they shouldnt play thematic tournaments if they plan on ducking out later.
Not a thematic issue. Only player moves count.
Any resignation impacts ratings in a tournament game. Your opponent withdrew so all games were resigned.
I also have the same "concern" MM - Concern may not be the right word but I get pissed off when I see my rating increase effortlessly. I live and die by the Benko Gambit and generally join every BG Tourney I can .... but I can't even begin to count the ratings points I've "milked" out of "no shows".
The withdrawers / resigners feed your rating. The actual "no shows", the ones who time out at less than 7 ply do not.
Not meant to be a poke at you. Thematics could be all unrated as points are milked from experimenting players.
the point is that whether they resign/withdraw or time out having not played any actual moves should not make any difference to rating gain.
There is no differentiation between early resignation and early timeouts for non-tournament games.
You are concerned about an unwarranted raise in rating. I can only speculate that lowering ratings on an early resigner, in tournament games, deters some who would join every tournament and withdraw from 99% of them when they find they had too many simultaneous games.
If your rating is too high the excess will be quickly doled out to the relatively underrated players you play in the future.
Hi, I think games with 0-1.5 moves which time-out or tournament resignations should not go into statistics or rating adjustment.
Currently my whole stats page is off because of 2 high level and a couple of lower level no-shows in a couple of tournaments - and even my highest win (and second highest) are now just timed-out games.
I'd like to get high ratings and nice stats - but through playing better chess - this just brings noise into my stats.
Winning on a time-out/no show is always annoying to me. I once suggested ratingchange would be an option to the winner of those games. (So only in case of a timed-out game) You could refuse tot take the points. If this was an automated action, there would not be any punisment to non-showers possible at all, and maybe you might just have made that one brilliant move te decide the game after all.
Equally annoying I find the fact that my biggest win, and almost everone else's, is a win on a not played, timed-out game. I'd like to have that big fish I once caugt, and really earned, exposed. There's an idea, maybe they should include a favorite game to display on your track-record.
I think the first 1.5 moves are almost all book moves or silly moves - so there's no brilliance to display there. And I think the rating of looser should go down - bur winner shouldn't get rating since there is really no substance to that game...
Which Vintage Soviet Russian Set do you Like the Most?
by Aant a few minutes ago
if Fischer played in 75, could Kasparov have defeated him in 1984?
by fabelhaft a few minutes ago
Clear the board
by thammushetty 120 seconds ago
10/24/2016 - Bishop Be Gone
by AbhiTheGr8 2 minutes ago
White to move and win (VIII)
by n9531l 4 minutes ago
Of course you owe a rematch
by protanly 10 minutes ago
Create a Frankenstein chess player!
by Karpark 13 minutes ago
New chess boards
by cghori 28 minutes ago
In this position, why h3?
by notmtwain 30 minutes ago
The mainline Scando
by pfren 31 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!