13639 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Any comparison to the Online directing when compared to the OTB directing?
That is a good question. I direct many online tourneys here. The only thing I seem to do is create the tourney, and the rest is done automatically. I have not read any helps for directors. You do have actions you can take as director regarding players. So compared to OTB this is a breeze!
Not really. landwehr pretty much summed it up: The "TDs" here usually do very little if anything at all once they organize and post a tnmt.
Online TDs need much more powers to overcome auto-decisions of the system here, e.g. kick players from running tournament, end games by default, change results, send/deny trophies etc.
I demanded that long ago but no response from the staff yet.
End games by default? Why? How often are OTB games "defaulted?" If you get any response I strongly suspect it will be the usual "Thanks we'll keep it in mind" your proposals will create as many if not more problems than they will solve, if any - IMHO
But I have very strong and principal reasons for it. It happened to me once: I spotted a computer cheater in a tournament I was directing and I could do nothing to stop him except filling report ticket. It was in 2009/10 when chess.com was spoiled heavily and staff ignored most cheating reports.
I am hundred percent sure TDs must bear the full responsibility for tournaments they run, not the site's staff.
I think that folks like you should get more control, unfortunately a lot of other members will not be as diligent or scrupulous as you are. I used to organize thematic tnmts (before they did away with them for all practical purposes by eliminating 95% of the opening choices available) and frankly I just wanted to play in them myself and not have to be responsible for everyone's honesty (or lack thereof).
BUT this is all a moot point since chess.com isn't about to give TDs any control at all that I'm aware of right now.
I want clear statement from the staff, either:
A) "Yes, we will consult members and work on it sometime", or
B) "No, members aren't just trustworthy enough to manage tournaments themselves."
The second option would necessarily mean running most of official correspondence chess tournaments outside of chess.com tournament format (pairings & tables with results in forums etc).
Problemas y Finales (X 26)
by n9531l 4 minutes ago
Titled Player being a "Sore Loser"
by RedGirlZ 8 minutes ago
Big iPhone / iPad Update!
by dystterrab 9 minutes ago
10/21/2016 - Marathon Mate
by joytoledo 10 minutes ago
How many chess games are possible ?
by tigerche 23 minutes ago
Should Knights be 4 point piece instead of 3?
by tigerche 25 minutes ago
Intuitive responses to d4
by sylensorr666 36 minutes ago
Weird opening ay..?
by sylensorr666 50 minutes ago
I need an opening for white
by pureluck 60 minutes ago
How I managed to get happy with # V3
by DENVERHIGH 67 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!