I want to present my summary of the book"THE ROAD TO CHESS MASTERY" Max Euwe and Walter Meiden. Today ,we will introduce the introduction.
The power of chess amateurs has wide range and there are many normal players can –by a lot of practice and serious study- achieve the principles of the right style of play. Also , they learn how to make strong moves and avoid the weak points on the board and they arrive to some stage which they don't make clear tactical wrongs.
Now, the question is that who is the master?? Master always has a wide view of point of the techniques to deal in every stage in the round which are the beginning , the middle and the ending of the game. He deals with the round by completeness that every move has tactical style ,strategical meaning or the both.
What about studying some aspects of chess which the difference between the master and the amateur appears clearly?
Somewhat there is no difference between them in the openingbut there is a big difference between playing the openingroutinely and with fully conceptualize. The master understand the meaning of the first moves tactically or strategically.
How can the amateur improve his techniques in playing the openings ? He should be aware of the main and commonopenings and the resultant tactical positions .
When the round moves toward the middle stage which is the hardest one , the pieces stand to fight but there is no touch. The authors think that the player should be strategical more than tactical in this stage. The middle of the round is that when the pieces are positioned in all the board so there are many complicated relations and probabilities to run. There is no easy formula to be expert in the middle but studying the master's rounds by conceptualize each move helps to do that .
Finally, the endgames are somehow theoretical and the masters know how to deal with them.
Hi everybody,
I want to present my summary of the book "THE ROAD TO CHESS MASTERY" Max Euwe and Walter Meiden. Today ,we will introduce the introduction.
The power of chess amateurs has wide range and there are many normal players can –by a lot of practice and serious study- achieve the principles of the right style of play. Also , they learn how to make strong moves and avoid the weak points on the board and they arrive to some stage which they don't make clear tactical wrongs.
Now, the question is that who is the master?? Master always has a wide view of point of the techniques to deal in every stage in the round which are the beginning , the middle and the ending of the game. He deals with the round by completeness that every move has tactical style ,strategical meaning or the both.
What about studying some aspects of chess which the difference between the master and the amateur appears clearly?
Somewhat there is no difference between them in the opening but there is a big difference between playing the opening routinely and with fully conceptualize. The master understand the meaning of the first moves tactically or strategically.
How can the amateur improve his techniques in playing the openings ? He should be aware of the main and common openings and the resultant tactical positions .
When the round moves toward the middle stage which is the hardest one , the pieces stand to fight but there is no touch. The authors think that the player should be strategical more than tactical in this stage. The middle of the round is that when the pieces are positioned in all the board so there are many complicated relations and probabilities to run. There is no easy formula to be expert in the middle but studying the master's rounds by conceptualize each move helps to do that .
Finally, the endgames are somehow theoretical and the masters know how to deal with them.
Yours
Aws Smadi
Email: morphy94@facebook.com