Last Update: 12 December 2021 (profile)

WARNING! Your actual accuracy is made higher (overestimated)!

ENVY AND PREJUDICE IN CHESS.COM HAVE GONE TOO FAR!

SOME PEOPLE FRAMED AND DEFAMED ME AND THEY STILL DO!

BUT IF I DIDN'T DO ANYTHING WRONG, THERE IS NO WAY I ADMIT THAT!

DON'T FORCE ME TO ADMIT THE WRONG DEED I DID NOT EVEN DO!

I WILL NOT APOLOGIZE!

Why analysis can be inaccurate and may fool you:

1. Many players' games with many mistakes have high accuracies! I have games (not saved) where in each game both players made many weak moves but each got >90%. Even if you overestimate the accuracy, you still get lower scores than the official ones!

I have tried making my own formula where I make all positive moves in some games have a same value and after my calculation, I got lower accuracies than the official ones! That means, all our official accuracies are overestimated, the estimation is even higher than your estimation.

2. Analysis considers best moves better than excellent moves while in fact not all best moves are actually excellent because forced mate moves and some normal moves are also considered best moves, but not excellent.

In endgame, usually excellent moves are marked as moves weaker than best moves. How can analysis mark some weaker moves as excellent moves? Do you even know how valuable is something in term of quality to be called 'excellent'??? If any moves weaker than best moves but not bad moves in endgame, then they should be marked as ok moves!!! Because if they are excellent, then they should give you huge advantages.

3. Analysis also marks bad openings as book moves, including some stupid gambits (such as Hamppe-Muzio Gambit and Corkscrew Gambit). Despite being bad moves, they are not marked as bad moves just because they are on ECO.

4. Not just accuracy, bots' ratings are overestimated. You can get 90-99% accuracy despite losing or playing a rough game against the 5th strongest bot who is "only" Master who is still weaker than Grandmaster, Super Grandmaster, and Maximum.

Meaning, you can get a very high accuracy despite playing far worse than the actual top engines or real GMs! HOW CAN YOU GET >90% ACCURACY WHEN YOUR LEVEL IS ONLY AROUND 5TH-BELOW STRONGEST BOT (AND THAT IS EVEN STILL CONSIDERED OVERESTIMATING YOURSELF)???

EVEN THE STRONGEST BOT (MAXIMUM) IS STILL WEAKER THAN TOP ENGINES. Try playing against bots from various levels. You can tell a 2000 rated bot plays like 1200 rated real human chess players do!!!

5. Not to mention their silly algorithm, like, come on! Giving a warning to a poster who submits a post just because it has a quote that contains profanity? Can't they distinguish between a post and a quote?

I HAVE PROOFS THAT YOUR ACCURACY IS MADE HIGHER THAN THE ACTUAL ONE!

This is just a small one. I still got many

CONCLUSION: ACCURACY IS UTTER NONSENSE!

IT IS SO WRONG IF YOU THINK ACCURACY IS NEVER TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT TO TELL WHETHER SOMEONE IS CLEAN OR NOT WHICH SHOWS A FAILURE TO CREATE A GOOD SYSTEM TO MAKE A FAIR CHESS COMMUNITY

Yurinclez2