Grand Slam Masters Final - Part 2: Who will prevail in Bilbao??

Grand Slam Masters Final - Part 2: Who will prevail in Bilbao??

  • Ivanchuk
  • Nakamura
  • Aronian
  • Anand
  • Carlsen
  • Vallejo

Created on October 5, 2011 | 4616 Votes | 11 Comments


  • 5 years ago


    Ivanchuk was for me the moral winner of this tournament. He prouf that he's a great champion, by continue playing after what happend to him( and to his hife) back in São Paulo. It's very dificult to do that whem you still may had problems with sleeping!... If that incident don't ocored i'm conviced that Chukie would prevail has the deserved winner. Nevertheless he was the moral winner.

    But having said that let's say that Carlsen was briliant in Bilbau. He played his strongest chess of the year in the game aggainst Ivanchuk, and of course deserved some credit for the victory. 

  • 5 years ago


  • 5 years ago


    all numbers added together is 99%,Undecided,nvm

  • 5 years ago


    I voted for Chuck, but I also like Aronian's style.

  • 5 years ago


    For rizzle Madog, Lev Has a good shot at bringing home the cup

  • 5 years ago


    I don't understand why Lev gets no love from the voters on these surveys? His score is fine, he is a very strong player, and he is known for being an aggressive and precise attacker which should be a boon in a 3-1-0 scoring system. Why all the faith in Carlsen and Anand but nothing for Lev with the same score?

  • 5 years ago


    O my!

    I completely forgot that Chucky was robbed few days ago and voted for him. 

    He probably will be playing and thinking how big that gun was.

    In such condition he unlikely would be playing like he did in the first half:(

  • 5 years ago


    Carlsen has White against Vallejo soon ... that already guarantess he is tied with Ivanchuk. Then I believe he will also prevail against Naka. And that's all she wrote ...

  • 5 years ago


    Second............ooooh! nar na nar na nar!Laughing

  • 5 years ago


    First!!!Tongue out

Back to Top

Post your reply: