Your Games Analzyed with Women's Grandmaster Tatev Abrahamyan is LIVE on Chess.com/TV Click here to watch!
Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

4/13/2012 - Unusual Mating Pattern


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #61

    ramin_d

    stupid

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #62

    SaiKrishna_K

    super stuff..

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #63

    onefineham

    Wow cool!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #64

    Ocky

    Very unusual and interesting!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #65

    ZacWilson

    Underpromotion is great!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #66

    waynedickinson2

    i recently traded off my pawn for a knight,to insure checkmate.Whatever that particular game dictates

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #67

    pyramider

    Interesting? very Unusual? Not so sure

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #68

    olegnaira17

    nice

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #69

    Chess_Ninja_2003

    @#%$! last

    hahahahahaha

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #70

    Chess_Ninja_2003

    oopsies

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #71

    maacos

    Second move is hard to find. 

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #72

    Kimboz

    jbeest wrote:

    Maybe the underpromotion gets to mate quickest, but I suspect there were alternatives.

    yes this is not really  a problem... is it?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #73

    RockCity

    first??

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #74

    thenovice

    At first, I tried the mate in 4: 3) Nhf7+ Qh7  4) Qxh7#

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #75

    Twobit

    Underpromotion...

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #76

    eddysallin

    melutu....knight and rook prevent k. onto f . file------not  game related,an open r. on f. file..a passed p. attacking the rook and the n.+ working w/ a Queen on a open h. file is a little much for actual chess game. 

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #77

    Jacob30

    ok

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #78

    shahronakm

    Good one.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #79

    mootaylor

    Good puzzle

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #80

    JuanIvan

     Very interesting pawn promotion.Nice one.


Back to Top

Post your reply: