Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

6/14/2012 - Mate in 3


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #101

    Djazbin

    #5; not #3...

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #102

    Norge2

    either they said mate in 3 to put us off track or they just cant plain count. that was 5 move checkmate, not 3!

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #103

    briansladovich

    Cool This is not the puzzle that was posted earlier today. The new puzzle is a repeat from a few weeks ago. The original puzzle was indeed, mate in three.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #104

    pet_am

    nice....

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #105

    leifnummelin

    nice!!

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #106

    pyramider

    Title says Mate in 3.. I could have sworn it is a mate in FIVE..Nice puzzle though..

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #107

    neurodarcy

    mate in 5?  

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #108

    Djazbin

    newblank wrote:

    a classic smothered mate

    ... in 5 moves.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #109

    yograjmatrx

    Very good puzzle

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #110

    nyLsel

    nice puzzle!

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #111

    sebrisco

    easy

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #112

    pawnstalkerz

    that wasnt a mate in 3

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #113

    wesleyelsew96

    Um.... definitley NOT a mate in 3...

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #114

    s0s0

    Didn't we just do this one last week?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #115

    JackTheBlack

    I don't know about authors math, but this is Mate in 5, not 3.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #116

    Blerd91

    Not a mate in 3. Still a good puzzle though.

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #117

    kana01

    hahaha typo, is really a mate in 5

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #118

    JonnyHudz_m8ster

    Mate in 3?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #119

    vika01

    super easy if typo was not there, it was a mate in 5 not three

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #120

    vika01

    mate in three was not possible in that puzzle


Back to Top

Post your reply: