16308 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Problem ID: 0146084
A compelling argument for connecting one's Rooks
Beautiful rook sacrifice!
This tactic works (which isnt's always the case) when playing "tactic vs. the computer":
[Black "Computer - Hard"]
1. Rxh6+ gxh6 2. Qxh6+ Kg8 3. Qg6+ Kh8 4. Rh1#
Guillermo, the reason this one "works" when playing Try vs. Computer is that every Black response is the only legal move.
uggh, i played pawn g6 instead of queen g6, this eventually results in checkmate, but its a much longer continuation
syvä huokaus (pettymys)
1...Kh8 2.Rxh6+ gxh6 3.Qxh6+ Kg8
But then instead of 4.Qg6+ (mate in 2) I went for the 4.g6, which is not as direct, but contrary to what the analysis suggests, also ends in mate (in 5):
4.g6 Rf7 5.gxf7+ Kxf7 6.Ne5+ Ke8 7.Qg6+ Kf8 8.Qf7#
Saw it fast but so often its a TT punish for rush. Solved 38s +6.
@dnately Correct, and after more than one year there is still an incorrect analysis line here. chess.com people just don't seem to care.
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!