there's a lot low rated players who are way too good for the noobs it's unfair and we can relate i propose a new rating system instead of being rated by rating player will be ranked based off wins and losses draws don't count win = stronger opponents loss = weaker opponents
i guess thats true but i dont think a new rating system is needed
More wins increase the rating and more losses decrease the rating so when you find your place the wins and losses balance out to 50 percent each...not counting draws. So your system is crap.
My theory is you suck. Prove my theory wrong 🤔
oof
My theory is you suck. Prove my theory wrong 🤔
oh really then how do i a 400 rating in bullet
My theory is you suck. Prove my theory wrong 🤔
lol
got em
No you didn't.
i was playing chess before you were born
That's sad. Maybe try checkers?
My 1750 rapid rating is bad. I don't know how or why most of you even continue.
My 1750 rapid rating is bad. I don't know how or why most of you even continue.
yeah thats bad
there's a lot low rated players who are way too good for the noobs it's unfair and we can relate i propose a new rating system instead of being rated by rating player will be ranked based off wins and losses draws don't count win = stronger opponents loss = weaker opponents