Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Beware 13. Rdg1!

Submitted by spassky on Sun, 12/13/2009 at 11:28pm.

As I noted in the previous article, "No Fire From This Dragon", English GM Jonathan Mestel recalls receiving a telegram from the British Chess Federation at the World Student Chess Olympiad in Mexico City in August of 1977 that read  "Miles says beware of American analysis of 13. Rdg1."  He said he had not the slightest doubt as to which position the telegram referred.  It was the Soltis Variation of the Yugoslav Attack vs. the Dragon Variation of the Sicilian Defense.
In the following two games, White gets to try two different followups to 13. Rdg1 against the same opponent two years apart.  Black helpfully duplicates his moves up to move 16, at which point White tries two different continuations.  In the first game, the rook on g1 plays no factor in the attack due to the way Black played, but sometimes I think the move may influence the way Black plays.  Just as some police never use their gun in 20 years, criminals may give up just by knowing that it could be used on them.  Similarly, Black may allow the h-file to be opened just to keep the more sensitive g-file closed.

In the second game, I try a suggestion that I saw in the notes to another move in a book on the Soltis Variation.  It really unleashes the rooks on g1 and h1.

So while I can't claim that 13. Rdg1 is the winning move against the Soltis Variation, it does create certain opportunities for White not available to him in other lines.  And if White is familiar with these motifs and Black is not, they can form a potent surprise to the unprepared Dragon player.

» posted in Opening Theory
 

Comments:

by Evasan - 2 years ago
Johannesburg South Africa
Member Since: Jun 2009
Member Points: 211

I've read up a bit on the move Rdg1, and apparently the best way to treat this would be 14. Qa5 instead of 14. Nc4 (which is also acceptable) and then playing Rfc8 and trying for an exchange sacrifice on c3. But I'd definitely play this the next time I face the dragon!Smile

by mordechaj - 2 years ago
Mallow Czech Republic
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 53

nice games!Wink

by kingspawn13 - 2 years ago
Johannesburg South Africa
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 49

Nice games.

by ericycsong - 2 years ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 540

good

by ogerboy - 2 years ago
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 710

MR Till - 

Right, sorry to repeat the analysis : (

by spassky - 2 years ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 422

To ogerboy:

You should have read my last article "No Fire From This Dragon" in which I mentioned 13...Qa5 and some of the analysis you copied from your book (which is also in every other Dragon book).  And in that line, 16. Qxc3, which you (your book) describe as "Black is slightly better" has been tried by me over the board (B. Till-F. Kurrasch, USATE 1998) and I drew easily.  So 13. Rdg1 gives White lots of winning chances and a draw if Black can find all the right moves.  Sounds pretty good to me!  Thanks for typing in all of that analysis.

PS  Read long-time Dragon expert Sergei Tiviakov's review of Dearing's book in New In Chess here: http://www.newinchess.com/Shop/Images/Pdfs/Review_75.pdf .  The review is the last one on pp.7-8.

by ogerboy - 2 years ago
Sydney Australia
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 710

I would regard 13...Nc4 to be quite inferior to the stronger 13...Qa5! All of the moves below are from Play the Sicilian Dragon by IM Dearing.

 

by layzathlete - 2 years ago
Brooklyn, NY, Sucre Bolivia
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 11

Very nice article.  Little bit weirded out by the life coaching and "new income" links though.  Seems like putting that in an article would be against chess.com policy.

by spassky - 2 years ago
Gaithersburg, MD United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 422

To gimly:

If 16....gxh5 (instead of 16....Nxh5 as in the game), then 17. Bh6! is given as winning for White, as in the game Hakki-Tolnai, Balatonbereny 1982, which went as follows: 17....Qa5 18. Bxg7 Kxg7 19. Nf5+! Bxf5 20. Qg5+ Kh8 21. Rxh5+ Nxh5 22. Qxh5+ Kg7 23. Qg5+ and Black Resigns because he can't interpose with the bishop (he would lose his queen on a5) and Kh7 or Kh8 both lose to Rh1+.  According to Mayer, "This is the game that probably contributed the most to White's interest in 13. Rdg1 in the early 1980's."  This game shows that Bh6 is certainly a powerful idea.  On move 18 of my game, however, Black has not opened the g-file with ...gxh5 allowing the White queen to come to g5 with check.  Therefore, on 18. Bh6, Black can play 18...Nxe4!, unleashing the bishop on g7, a recurring theme in this opening when the rook is on c4.  Now the queen can't protect both the knight on d4 and the bishop on h6, as well as herself on d2.  The best continuation is 19. Qh2 Rxd4 20. Bxg7 Kxg7 21. Qh6+ Kf6 22. Qf4+ Kg7 23. Qh6+ Kf6 with a perpetual check.  In this position, White is down a bishop and two pawns and attempts to chase the Black king further (like 24. Rf1+) may look dangerous for Black, but the king has just enough cover to slip away and Black ends up with a won game.  So it looks like 18. Bh6 just leads to a draw with best play.  Nice try, though!

by gimly - 2 years ago
anytown United States
Member Since: Nov 2008
Member Points: 423

Mr Till,

I have a question about the second game.  At 18 you played Nf5 which is winning.  What would have happened if white had gone in with Bh6?  As i was going through the second game that was the move i saw (i've been trying to work on my chess solitaire) and you didn't mention it.  Is it too fast?  Does black have good counter play after Bh6?  Black seems to be playing better in the second game, but the h file is wide open and white's major pieces are well placed.  Just curious.  Thx.

by contrapunctus - 2 years ago
Melbourne Australia
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 328

wow you have never lost a game! Interesting variation

 

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.