Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Do You Know the Classics?

Submitted by GM Julio_Becerra on Wed, 01/06/2010 at 12:04am.

Classic: Of the first or highest quality, class, or rank; serving as a standard, model, or guide.  --Dictionary.com Unabridged. Random House, Inc. 05 Jan. 2010.

There are no precise criteria for defining the classics in chess. It would be a game or tits fragment (e.g. combinations, positional play and endgames). It would be played by outstanding chess players or it could be the masterpieces of little-known or unknown chess players. It could be from a major or minor competition.  From the aesthetic point of view, however, it does matter whether the game was played in a match for the chess crown or in a blitz tournament.

Alongside combinations by the leading lights of the game you will see equally brilliant examples of creativity from ordinary masters. And it should be noted that if,  alongside the works of champions, you find a combination not produced by famous chess players, you can be sure that it deserves to be there! Naturally, the games of World Champions and famous Grandmasters attract more attention to themselves; every one of their tactical operations is in the public eye!

Many of our contemporaries’ games will become classics, but we can only call a game a classic once it has withstood the test of time.

In this issue I want to share with you, my dear readers, some little known classic positions.  Though less know, they are very instructive. Remember guys, you can play a classic game as well; you do not need to be a famous or outstanding player!

 

» posted in Amazing Games
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by Mephisto - 16 months ago
always on the move International
Member Since: Jun 2010
Member Points: 279

ah ! have no words to desribe these games ! thank u for posting these classics.

by jaycsa - 17 months ago
Pokhara Nepal
Member Since: Jun 2010
Member Points: 442

nice

by loved - 2 years ago
Michigan United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 1497

for me it was educational. thank you!

by ericycsong - 2 years ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 540

nice

by sryiwannadraw - 2 years ago
Southern Coast United States
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 453

cool

by madpawn - 2 years ago
London England
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 1039

I am inspired to look a little closer when | play. One of the best articles EVER!

Brilliant! Thank you for taking the trouble to post.

by NinjaBear - 2 years ago
LOL, I'm not really in China
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1327

These are excellent! Thank you.

by leonelcm - 2 years ago
Mexico City Mexico
Member Since: Feb 2008
Member Points: 898

Very interesting all games shown, thanx for sharing...

by jah_skido - 2 years ago
Suva Fiji
Member Since: Jan 2010
Member Points: 17

nce stuff i really like the last stuff..inspirational stuff

by leoz08 - 2 years ago
Makati Philippines
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 57

classics are the results of play of some imaginative players. great article.

by mufasah123 - 2 years ago
Vanuatu
Member Since: Apr 2009
Member Points: 94

Good article.  Unfortunate typo is all I can say.

by FM VPA - 2 years ago
Valsad-Gujarat India
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 1369

All very didactic examples. I would like to quote my game but I don't say it fulfills the criterion of classical game.

32...Qb6+ 33.Qxb6 Rxe1+ 34.Kh2 Rd1 35.Rg3 Re6 0-1

by tanmay_chakrabarti - 2 years ago
Uttarpara India
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 2093

awesome article.

by Athanatos - 2 years ago
Brussels Belgium
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 46

@bugs111

No, it is lost for black, if he takes it with the bishop the d pawn makes a queen, if he taks with the rook, the h pawn makes the queen.

by Alphastar18 - 2 years ago
Groningen Netherlands
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 2128

I knew the second one and the last two.

There is actually some controversy surrounding the last combination (Ortuega - Sanz), because the exact same combination is reported to have been played 2 years earlier by Wojciechowski. You can read about it in detail here:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~timkr/chess/rxb2.htm

by bellicose - 2 years ago
unknown United Kingdom
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 2

who said doubled pawns were a weakness? That last game was simply awesome.

by bugs111 - 2 years ago
negeri sembilan Malaysia
Member Since: Sep 2008
Member Points: 173

Nenarokov, Vladimir Ivanovich vs. Grigoriev, Nikolay Dmitrievich  could be a draw right?

by Crowded_House - 2 years ago
Calne, Wiltshire England
Member Since: Aug 2007
Member Points: 479

Good stuff!

by staggerlee - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 891

Gorgeous!

by MountainSnow - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Jan 2010
Member Points: 1

"Tits fragment"?  I am shocked!  Just kidding, typos happen to everyone, and the first line gave me a chuckle...great article, I do love classic games!

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.