Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Good and Bad Pieces

  • WGM Natalia_Pogonina
  • | May 17, 2011
  • | 19054 views
  • | 54 comments

Each piece has its relative value. During the game it may vary depending on what position the piece occupies and what role it plays. It’s hard to win when some of your pieces are misplaced. Therefore, you should make sure all your pieces are taking part in the fight, and try to worsen the placement of opponent’s pieces.

Here are some general tips (as always in chess, there are exceptions) for each piece:

  1. King. Good: in the opening and middlegame it should be castled, safely protected by pawns; active in the endgame. Bad: exposed and uncastled in the opening and middlegame; locked out of the game or far away from the main action in the endgame.
  2. Queen. Good: active, participates in the main action, has lots of maneuvering space. Bad: passive, serves as a blocker for a pawn or a target for the opponent’s pieces.
  3. Rook. Good: placed on open files, 7-8th (1-2 for Black) ranks; doubled rooks are especially powerful. Bad: no open files and maneuvering space.
  4. Bishop. Good: there are open diagonals, attacks both flanks and has a nice “shooting range”. Bad: limited in maneuvering, blocked by pawns.
  5. Knight. Good: placed on key squares, e.g. in the centre or near the opponent’s king (e.g. on f5 if Black castles short). Bad: on the rim of the board, on the 1st or 8th rank.
  6. Pawn. Good: controls important squares and can potentially be promoted. Bad: isolated or doubled.

This is general advice, each particular position should be considered individually. Sometimes positional sacrifices occur that are connected with the dynamic strength of the pieces (when their value increases above their nominal value). Another important point is coordination of the pieces. Even if each piece is active on its own, but not coordinated and working together, their power decreases. The synergistic effect of well-coordinated pieces may often overpower armies composed of more valuable (in the nominal sense) pieces that aren’t cooperating well enough.

So, one of the main rules of chess is to keep all your pieces in the game (except for, maybe, the king). Always ask yourself a simple question: are all my pieces happy? If not, try to improve their placement. Coordinated pieces are much more powerful than lonely ones.

Rule #2 – try to worsen the position of your opponent’s pieces, hinder their coordination. One of the possible approaches is to limit the activity of the pieces and lock them out on one of the flanks, while attacking on the other. Create weaknesses in your opponent’s camp so that he/she has to guard them, thus limiting the activity of the pieces. The player who has more active well-coordinated forces is usually a clear favorite.

The following game has been played at the recent Russian Team Chess Championship vs WGM Vera Nebolsina.

 

Black didn’t simplify the position in time, so White’s chances for a win increased. I decided to exploit the weakness of Black’s dark-squared bishop and sacrificed a pawn. However, in time trouble I made a serious blunder by accidentally repeating the position thrice instead of twice.

Comments


  • 4 days ago

    FRNW

    very interesting article, keep up the good work

  • 3 months ago

    ClockBurner

    Very good article.  I've always wondered in the past what it ment to "Make you opponents pieces less corrdinated" but this art. made it very clear.  thx!

  • 3 months ago

    starkillervader

    How can somebody remember their game or is it given to them as sovenir 

  • 5 months ago

    Pahriadi62

    Reading this article makes me want to read more and more other articles.

  • 10 months ago

    lor12

    Ecellent article 

  • 10 months ago

    Beginnerkhan

    Thanks

  • 13 months ago

    SHOWKAAT

    Nice article, Thanksssssss...................

  • 16 months ago

    GoMath1123

    Conan would be proud for the word "thrice" being worked into the article.

  • 16 months ago

    hopsplace

    Excellent article. Thank you.

  • 17 months ago

    THENUKA_U

    This is a very nice article.Thankyou for this article

  • 21 months ago

    nyLsel

    nice article! I now deterimine the key squares of knight. And open files with bishop. thanks!

  • 23 months ago

    RafaMJZ

    Nice article, Thanks :D

  • 2 years ago

    The_Aggressive_Bee

    People are always getting on my case about how bad my peices are.  Thx for the arctical!

  • 2 years ago

    subse7en1229

    excellent article

  • 2 years ago

    CombinationMaster97

    GM Bogonina, thanks for the article. I also read your article "Creative Thinking" and I have to agree that I'm not really creative or natural. I'm only a teenager, no chessprodigy. My dream is of course to become a GM some day but I know it will never become true. Well, fortunately dreaming is allowed. It's good to have dreams. Anyway, I'm learning and getting better all the time. I also use the Morphy's Defense in Ruy Lopez, like everybody does nowadays.

    Thank you.

  • 2 years ago

    ekpea

    @bresando

    thanks.

    the 3...a6 move is very useful for Black in the spanish, it "improves" most lines. black has the option of removing the tension between wBa4 and bNc6 by ...Pb5.

  • 2 years ago

    ekpea

    I think 5...f5 is better than 5...Bd7

  • 2 years ago

    bresando

    @ ekpea

    Sorry for returning to this late. In this improved (or modern) variation B encourages W to either capture immediately or never, since B can now play b5 if needed. It's the same for the open variation for example (which become a berlin defense if a6 is omitted). 

    Concretely speaking, the main problem in the classical steinitz is 

    1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 d6 4. d4 Bd7 5. Nc3 Nf6 6. O-O Be7 7. Re1

    And now 7...exd4 += with a passive position is forced since

    7. ... O-O? 8. Bxc6 Bxc6 9. dxe5 dxe5 10. Qxd8 Raxd8 11. Nxe5 
    Is the beginning of the so called Tarrash trap.
    With a6 Ba4 inserted, B can avoid this with ...b5 before 0-0 with a good position. This is the reason of "improved steinitz".
  • 2 years ago

    Knight_Sweeper

    I really appreciate the games you put up to show your explanations because you are being very humble by putting up those games in which you have not shown your opponents bad play or mistakes but you have shown your games where you have made mistakes, it also shows me that from a game i lose if i analyse i can be a great player. Thanks and you are one of my favourite writers in chess from today. 

  • 2 years ago

    The_Lionheart

    I strongly agree with all of it!

Back to Top

Post your reply: