Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

How to Play a Tournament

Submitted by WIM energia on Fri, 11/20/2009 at 2:06am.

Once again, I will deviate from the topic of my chess column – exchanges. In this column I will present some thoughts on practical tournament strategies based on my own experience. There is much advice of what to do when one does not do well in the tournament: change something, keep fighting, chose a different opening strategy, etc. What to do when you do well in the tournament? With the so-called pressure that the leader has to carry? I have tons of experience starting a tournament with 0-2 and coming back with a streak of wins… Having 3-0 does not happen often but I ended up with that many points last weekend in the annual King’s Island Open tournament, which was held in Ohio. I played the three rounds against 2100 players who managed to beat 2300s and 2200s, so they were dangerous opponents. So, me and GM Ben Finegold had 3, while GM Perelshtein had half a point less and IM Brian Smith one point less- a good situation to be at. Playing a grandmaster in the fourth round and hoping to win some prize money is not a situation I recommend anyone to be in. But if the goal of the tournament is just to play good people and learn from them then this is an ideal situation.

                I prepared some line five minutes before the game and was incredibly lucky because Ben ran into the line, which he never played before. He spent 1 hour, while I spent 15 min., when we reached the final position GM Finegold offered me a draw. What to do? I have a better position, he ran into my preparation, I know that the position is far from winning but the attack is dangerous. I have more time and black has to spend tons of time to find the correct defense. My thought process in the final position was the following: “hmm a draw, means if Perelshtein wins he gets to play Ben while I get someone with a 2300 rating- nice!, but my position is sooo good, I would waste this great preparation, and my coaches will kill me after the game, and he is low on time…. But if I can draw a GM it wouldn’t be much trouble to do well in the last round.” Wrong, all wrong… this is the moment where I put a cross on my tournament. They say: where there is a draw, a loss will follow. I thought too much about the tournament situation instead of simply playing chess and hoping for the best. I felt guilty after the game for accepting the draw. I knew that there was a good chance I would make a mistake and he would outplay me, since he is a better player, but I had to play out a better position. Below is the game.

                So, the last round situation: me and Ben 3.5, he plays Perelshtein as we thought and I play a 2300 player, Seth Homa. A draw gives me a class prize, a win tie or clear first. I was very nervous before the game because I really wanted to with this open tournament. I think that it was the right decision to play for a win in this game, since to play for a draw usually loses the game. So, I felt aggressive and went for a full point. If there is a chance to win the tournament one should go for it. Here is the analysis of the game.

                A disappointing loss, but totally deserved. Playing more calmly, being flexible with ideas, instead of concentrating on the one idea of the knight sacrifice, I could have played Ne4 and gotten a pleasant edge. I wanted a game won in a nice, attacking style and over-evaluated my position; and the penalty for that was a loss. At the end I would like to show the game that was played in the last round between two grandmasters. Ben was defending with white the whole game. He managed to draw in the end. I came to think that Grandmasters differ from non-GMs in the ability to make a draw when needed. Offering me a draw in the previous position was a good practical chance. While, having great technique and tons and tons of patience to draw the game presented below truly reflects chess class.

                In the end, sometimes tournament winners are not the ones who try to win at all cost but those who are smart enough to offer a draw. Risk is good but unnecessary risk is pointless. Thus, only by having this experience I came to the conclusion that winning chess tournaments requires not only good chess moves but also knowing when to take a draw and when to play for a win.

» posted in Middlegame
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by JoshMason - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: Dec 2009
Member Points: 58

Very interesting, a hard choice to make, but drawing a GM is something to be proud of in itself.

by XavierPadilla - 2 years ago
Mazatlán, Sin. Mexico
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 1972

@jedikush: 37. ... Kh7 38. Qc2+ Qg6 (38. ... Kh6 39. Rb1) 39. Qxg6+ Kxg6 40. Rb1

by cubefactor - 2 years ago
Murfreesboro, TN United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 137

Great article.  I think the debate on drawing in tournaments is a good one and worthy of discussion - However, I doubt there is an ultimately correct answer to be found.  Each individual player has a different motive, and has the liberty under the governing rules of chess to make these decisions.  Whether it defies the spirit of chess is a moot point, because that spirit is defined differently based on perspective.

Personally, I tend to overplay drawn positions for the sake of resource & practice.  I did not go through the trouble of preparing, waking up early, paying an entry fee, and maintaining various chess memberships.. only to cut a game short prematurely.  In the lower classes each drawn position is losing anyway because perfect play is destined to be lacking.  In GM play this is probably different but even a sleeping board can hold hidden resources (and most of aren't qualified to recognize such situations).

Two players agreeing to a draw to maintain a favorable position in the tournament standings?  This privelage is earned by the players through their performance, in my opinion.  I'm not a strong enough player to find myself facing such crossroads, but I'm not opposed to the idea depending on the circumstances.

by tadartabo - 2 years ago
arunachal pradesh,itanagar India
Member Since: Mar 2009
Member Points: 154

the ability of the GM`s to make zugzwang and waiting moves is really great.

thanks for this article !!!!!!!!

by Irinasdaddy - 2 years ago
Dracut United States
Member Since: Nov 2009
Member Points: 1

ElDude56 obviously has not won many tournaments then.  All refusing to accept a draw will do is cost you games in the end, and cost you the respect of your peers.  If you make people, week after week, waste an extra hour or two of their lives in games that are clearly drawn, they will think you are a dishonorable player.

 

Bobby Fischer didn't draw often in that book because first, those are only 60 of his thousands of games and second, he was the best player in the WORLD.  You, ElDude56, are NOT the best player in the world.  You are not even close.  All you do is insult other players with that attitude.  

by skewer2000 - 2 years ago
Leesburg United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1164

I love Alisa Melekhina.

by B97 - 2 years ago
United States
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 100

In the Seth Homa game would 7... cxd5 transpose to a line in the Sicilian Dragon?

Just out of curiosity, is there any GM/IM out there who simply plays for a win? Rambo players may not accumulate titles, but they sure as hell would entertain the crowd!

by likenoleother - 2 years ago
Tampa Florida United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 115

Fine article. Good advice

by jedikush - 2 years ago
Losangeles United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 182

i can see Rxc8+ but after Kh7... Nf8+ or Rb7+ or Rc7+  Kh6.. with no more viable checks... white now has to deal with a queen being attacked....

by ChessMastora - 2 years ago
Beijing China
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 313

Maths hmk ahh

by XavierPadilla - 2 years ago
Mazatlán, Sin. Mexico
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 1972

@jedikush: 36. ... Bc3 37. Rxc8+

by ericycsong - 2 years ago
Toronto Canada
Member Since: May 2009
Member Points: 540

good

by jedikush - 2 years ago
Losangeles United States
Member Since: Feb 2009
Member Points: 182

In your game with seth woulndt 36. Bc3 attacking the queen have been good? i dont c a quick mate for seth.. :)

 

given that if Qxc3 it is Mate with Qd1

by ipawnedmychessset - 2 years ago
Phoenix, Arizona United States
Member Since: Jun 2008
Member Points: 61

that Finegold, B. vs. Perelshteyn, E. game at the end cracked me up when i saw how they drew. That is one epic draw.

by camdawg7 - 2 years ago
america United States
Member Since: Dec 2007
Member Points: 307

the last game is the only one with an "honorable" draw.  The 1st game is just an example of a wasted game, which you state, but it is far too early for anyone, and I mean ANYONE to know if this will end up in a draw.  Draws like the first game should be illegal. It's such a cop out.  What's the point of playing a game if you are going to draw so early just because you might lose!  IF you lose then good for your opponent!

by Soulcrates - 2 years ago
Albuquerque, New Mexico United States
Member Since: Jan 2008
Member Points: 354

I liked the last draw especially. There was literally nothing to do for either side.

by XavierPadilla - 2 years ago
Mazatlán, Sin. Mexico
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 1972

Great article, thank you for sharing!

Keep up the good (home)work!  Wink

by shareefh - 2 years ago
Amman Jordan
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 227

Thanks for your informative article, i think to be the one is any body right, but some times as you said to win, you have to draw.

by 1wa - 2 years ago
Inglewood, CA United States
Member Since: Oct 2008
Member Points: 165

Informative games. Thank you for the commentary too.

by towtintin - 2 years ago
Midwest United States
Member Since: Sep 2009
Member Points: 82

thanks for sharing the experiences and games

Laughing

« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.