# Make a Connection!

• GM Gserper
• | Dec 8, 2013
• | 14287 views

I decided to write on this subject after I saw the discussion in the comments section of last week's article where we talked about the tricky B+N checkmate. Somebody asked the question "why not Kd1 ??? what must we do after 58.Kd1 ??" Let's look at the position in question:

Indeed it looks like after the unavoidable 59...Kc2 the black king runs away from the cage. This is a very popular misconception and precisely the reason why sometimes even strong chess players cannot deliver a checkmate in this relatively simple endgame. They see that the opponent's king escapes and dismiss the whole variation even though it is the correct technique.

To avoid this serious speed bump on your way to victory, I addressed the issue in my article: "There is one trick which you must know. When you push your opponent's king from the 'wrong' corner to the 'right' corner at some point it looks like he just escapes. But this is just an illusion. The knight and the bishop create a firm barrier, so the king is still locked." After which I gave the game:

Of course this game answers the reader's question, because the position is pretty much identical to the Ivanchuk game. I expected someone to point out the correct solution:

And yet, people suggested some other solutions (and some of them were not particularly correct). Yes, when you have two extra pieces then there are many different ways to solve the problem, but why look for complicated ways when the simple solution was already described in the article?

Here we face a very interesting phenomenon which I encounter many years ago. The year was 1996 and I had a lecture followed by a simul in Madison, Wisconsin. The subject of my lecture was combinations and as an example of a combination in a very early stage of the game I used the next game:

You can imagine my amazement when one of my games in the simul reached the next position:

I just couldn't believe how it was possible for my opponent who played White in this game to fall into the combo that we discussed pretty much 30 minutes before the game. Then I realized that many people enjoy chess the same way most people enjoy art or any kind of creative activity. It is similar to many people that I personally know who go to a movie, enjoy it and a year later cannot even recollect if they watched the movie.

I guess my opponent from that game enjoyed the combinations the same way and just forgot about it 30 minutes later. My recommendation is simple: whenever you encounter a beautiful chess concept, enjoy its aestetic value first. Then ask yourself a simple question: "How can I benefit from this concept?" When I was a kid I even had a notebook where I would draw diagrams with the ideas that I could use in my games. Of course I am talking not just about opening ideas. Look for example at the next game of a young Tal:

This middlegame idea has nothing to do with the opening. Black wanted to push his 'f' pawn to effectively stop White's attack, so Tal prevented this move even if it could cost him a rook.

Now look at the next famous game of Fischer and try to find the correct move:

I hope that from now on whenever you learn a new chess idea, you will be able to recognize the pattern and use it in your own games.

Good luck!

RELATED STUDY MATERIAL

• 24 months ago
[COMMENT DELETED]
• 24 months ago

TQ SIR

• 24 months ago

And here my friends is the best game EVER played displaying the strength of pawns........Thanks Grigory !!
• 24 months ago

You could always fix the typo right?

• 24 months ago

My Dearest Gregory,

Thank you so much for this sublety my Darling. And you were fabulous in your game against Nikolaidis in 1993. IMO (my opinion's aren't humble), one of the nicest games I've ever looked over. Congrats and be proud my sweetness. It gets my 5E rating: Enchanting, Enticing, Eloquent, Exciting, and most of all, Entertaining !........

• 24 months ago

its chess..or not?

• 24 months ago

on the Tal game on the white combo on white's move on move 22 white should play Qh7#.

• 24 months ago

In the Tal v Leonov game, it seems to me that 19. Rf6 was actually inferior. 19. c4 instead seems to be better, as it essentially guarantees White can land a crippling knight on d6 eventually and that he can trade off Black's remaining knight with Bxh7+. In addition to Tal's good knight vs bad bishop in that position, he can get pieces trained on the f7 square, with the a1 rook coming in.

• 24 months ago

@Anarchessism,

woops! Apparently 23.Ng4 fxg4 24.Qh7 is not exactly mate as I thought.

You are right:22...f5 is the best move, but white is still slightly ahead with a strong attack.
I had to turn my engine on this one. I won't spoil it to the other readers though.

• 24 months ago
[COMMENT DELETED]
• 24 months ago

@Nao83 You're right. I had a typo of my own. It should have been move 22.

If you play 23. Ng4 even though that square is now covered by the f-pawn, then how do you win after 23... fxg4 ? I suppose you could play 24. Bg6, but there's no win after 24... Qf8, and there might not even be a draw.

• 24 months ago

I like this sentence  "How can I benefit from this concept?" .... Thank you.

• 24 months ago

Do I remember Karl? Are you kidding me? Who would forget Karl?

He used to say that "since Serper was a student of the famous Botvinnik - Kasparov school, it means that when I played in a simul against him, I played against the whole mighty Soviet School of chess!"

I hope Karl is doing fine!

• 24 months ago

Sparked my memory.  Karl the librarian always spoke highly of you during the blitz sessions in the Rathskeller.

I wonder if you know who I am talking about.

• 24 months ago

@Anarchessism, in the other line (19... gxf6 20. exf6 Nxf6 21. Qxh6 Ne4 22. Bxe4) I think that the refutation of 22...f5 (I suppose that you did not mean 23...f5 24.Nf6#) is again 23.Ng4!!

• 24 months ago

awesome stuff

• 24 months ago

Thank you to all the sharp-eyed readers who noticed an obvious typo.  Of course instead of 19...Nxf6 20 exf6 gxf6 it is supposed to be 19...gxf6 20 exf6 Nxf6 21. Qxh6 Qf8 and here since neither 22 Qh7x nor 22.Bh7+ is possible, White plays 22.Qxf6 with a very strong attack.

I apologize for the typo and also want to commend those of you who don't play through the games just to enjoy them (like watching a movie), but actually critically analyze them.  Great job!

• 24 months ago

vb v hbc hbgcvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvccccccccccccccccccccccccccccuygfufhkhuglhbgulbuglfbfoulnuoflhnbbbbbbbhufbbbuofhbfuuilnhufunhghghghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhcccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwaaaaaaaaaaatreshecthdcyjccryjfcffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffrvhjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjghegdcygcvcjyguuuuuuuuuuuuurbjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjybrrgggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

• 24 months ago

in the Mikhail Tal  Leonov game in the second variation you present for move 19.Qf8(19... Nxf620. exf6gxf621. Qxh6Qf822. Qxf6with a very strong attack for White.) you missed the simply (

• 24 months ago

in the tal leonov game after 21...Qf8 i believe 22. Qh7 mates...what am i missing here?