Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Making Money in Chess

  • WGM Natalia_Pogonina
  • | Sep 21, 2010
  • | 32195 views
  • | 80 comments

People often ask me whether they will be able to become a grandmaster. Another question that derives from it is: “How much will I be making?” Young guys are especially pragmatic, so for many of them the choice between getting a job in the office and becoming a chess pro is quite acute.

First of all, let’s classify the main legal means of earning money in chess:

1)      Prize money. By far the most obvious one. The winner of the world championship typically gets $1-2 mln. (1,300,000 euros for Anand in 2010). By winning a top event (e.g. Linares) one gets something like 100,000 euros. Anything above $50k usually refers to a prestigious round robin. Top open events normally have a first prize of about $20k (one needs to perform way above 2700 to win them). A typical event won by a 2500+ GM has a first prize of below $5k. Of course, there are exceptions (like the U-something tournaments that are quite popular in the US). However, this is very uncommon in other countries.

2)      Playing for clubs. Probably the main income of pre-elite grandmasters who are paid $5-20k for competing for a certain club.

3)      Appearance fees – works for top pros who are paid to “show up” at a certain event, thus boosting its prestige. A more modest and closely related term is “conditions” – usually coverage of hotel/travelling expenses, a small fee (few hundred bucks) at best.

4)      Scholarships and stipends. Bright chess-playing students may get some special burses. Members of national teams also often have a special wage. However, even in Russia the official member of the Russian Olympic team’s salary has been symbolic up to this point (let’s hope the situation is going to become better in the future). In many other countries they don’t have any special privileges at all.

5)      Sponsorships – to obtain those you basically have to prove that you either are already an established pro with a strong brand (and, preferably, good looks), or are highly likely to become one. Then some companies may be willing to invest in being associated with you and ask for your endorsement.

6)      Coaching – not connected with being a professional player, but also quite popular. On the Internet IMs and GMs charge about $20-50 per hour, “stars” request more (up to $100 and even more). Of course, there are exceptions, i.e. crazy IMs from poor countries willing to work for food, or lucky guys who have found a customer willing to make them a millionaire.

7)      Being a chess second – assisting eminent players at their home lab. Playing sparring matches, preparing novelties, pinpointing opponents’ weaknesses.

8)      Performances – simuls, exhibition matches and other events of this type.

9)      Literature – writing books & columns.

10)   Organizational work – being an arbiter, tournament director, etc.

11)   Selling chess merchandise – that was especially popular in the post-Soviet world when people would be travelling around the world with heavy bags of rare chess books and equipment and selling it at the events where they played. Nowadays this looks less dramatic, but still works.

12)   Hustling – some people make money by beating other guys in blitz or bullet. You can see a lot of chess hustlers at parks or at chess clubs.

13)   Betting – winning (or losing) money by correctly predicting the outcomes of chess matches, etc.. Also prop betting, e.g. “bet you $X that I will make it to 2100 in a year?!”.

Now (without disclosing any personal information of my chess friends) let’s quickly estimate what level one should have in chess to earn a certain amount. We are talking about the “average” player of each level. For example,  one 2700+ GM may participate in 20 events per year, while the other – only in 5. We will be considering the median. The same holds for other means of earning.

$10 mln/year – no one

Over $1 mln/year – top-3 in the world

Over $200k – top-10

Over $100k – top-50

Players close to the bottom of the top-100 are very unlikely to earn over $100k, for most the figure would be about $50-70k.

The point of this article is to suggest new ideas of how to earn in chess to people who are already involved in it professionally of semi-professionally, and to address the question “how much do chess players make?” Each person has his/her own idea of what “enough” is, so for someone $100k/year sounds like a lot of money, while others would scoff at the notion of not being able to earn $10 mln/year by playing chess. Also, no matter whether one considers himself to be a pro or not, it doesn’t deprive anyone of the chance to enjoy chess! Smile

Now, before someone accuses me of talking about general things without offering chess food for thought (“I don’t care how much they earn, teach me something about chess itself”), let’s go over one of my latest games from the Russia-China match:

Comments


  • 8 weeks ago

    buckwild84

    This article is simply not true. I know few top 50 players and none of them earns 100 k. In current EUROPEAN CH. First prize is like 15 k euro. Its not much. In how many tournaments you have prize like that? This article is from cosmos. Prizes in tournaments are lower and lower with every year and you must be veeeeery good player to earn 100k. Not much 2700 players can. Just few.

  • 8 months ago

    kencoach

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 12 months ago

    Ornithologist

    What sort of strength would you need to be a coach. would this be just im and gm who could do this?

  • 15 months ago

    scbaliarsingh

    i want money 

  • 20 months ago

    jaycsa

    nice game

  • 20 months ago

    przchess

    Excellent article! Thanks for revealing us the information

  • 20 months ago

    goldknight3000

    nice game Ms. Natalia!

  • 20 months ago

    marinas

    Always interesting articles.Thank you !No pochemu vse stali takimi merkantilnemi?How much money top players earn?!but how famous they are!How happy must they be!

  • 20 months ago

    DadInc

    Chess.com says it has 2.3 millions members. This number is probably as Paul said an indication of how many "accounts" are open. There are many dormant accounts. I've noticed also that members who open multiple accounts had their accounts closed recently.

    To recoup membership with players active on Chess.com, note that about 310,000 members are ranked players "online" i.e turned-based (many with non-paying membership) for standard chess + 14,000 playing chess360 with some of them being already counted in the 310,000 + a few 1,000 playing "live" chess. And I agree with Natalia that probably no less than 1,000 members read actively the best Forums/articles, other viewers being just curious.  

    So 315,000 active members is probably what Chess.com reality is, but they have to manage a mass transit of more than 2 millions accounts most of them not paying any fee. This mass, however could be attractive to potential advertisers on the site and to their shop online. Chess.com has not an easy job, that they do amazingly well in fact and with a passion for good chess, pro and amateurSmile

  • 20 months ago

    misodle

    @Natalia_Pogonina

    Also, this "over 2 mln people" at Chess.com is strongly overrated.

    The guys that run the website certainly know the real numbers. The total number is most likely everyone that has ever created an id to play a game. As a regular columnist I would think you could find out this information by simply asking nicely. Those who are active members I would agree are a much smaller percentage.

    The site appears to use Google Analytics to track usage information and this is a very powerful tool. Be certain they know exactly who their audience is. For a general look at site traffic for chess. com see this the link below. It gives a nice overview of the reach of the site in terms of % of hits vs. the entire internet. The site is quite impressive (Rank around 2000 worldwide) and the last couple of years shows traffic more than doubling.

    I would be very curious if the site published something about all members vs. regular members, etc. (Hint). While I think you are correct in that there are not 2 million active members, I think that there are many who come here to lurk and read the articles, and to play some chess, and never comment or join communities, etc. People who like chess but are simply far too busy to put too much time into it.

    For me personally I have little time to dedicate to chess but used to play long ago, and internet and sites like this have opened up the possibility to play chess as time permits. I know you don't consider correspondence chess to be "real" chess, but for me it is about the only way I can find time for a serious game (spend a few minutes a day considering 1 move).

    Have some hope...the website is not as big as the total number says but the total number of casual users is probably a bit higher than you would think (me for instance). I have been on this site for about 9 months and love all the content but you would never know I was here simply because I have never posted anything before.

    http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/chess.com.

    Best Regards,

    Paul Odle

  • 20 months ago

    WGM Natalia_Pogonina

    @ millvillage I am not very knowledgeable about FIDE's financial regulations.

    As to donations - they are not very efficient from what I've heard from website owners and know from personal experience. Also, this "over 2 mln people" at Chess.com is strongly overrated. Haven't you noticed that at the forum you meet the same people each day; the daily column gets just a few thousand views (sic! views, not even people). If there had really been over 2 mln people here, views would have been at least in the hundred thousands. In my opinion, the real population is at least 10 times less, and many people visit Chess.com very rarely.

  • 20 months ago

    Dio

    Fun to read and great information. Keep it up! :)

  • 20 months ago

    FM FM_Eric_Schiller

    Teaching/coaching is the best option in America. Compensation can be a bit higher than you indicate. Writing is not so good, the royalty rate is very low. I get $1-$2 per copy sold of my major books. Over the 28 years I have been writing I have sold a lot of copies,but not enough to live on.

    Teaching over the Internet looks like the best option, as it is low cost (SKYPE and InnerPass or SharedView are free and can be used with your favorite chess progran, allowing you to choose among all your annotated games for lessons and even send students the PGN files). I'm even teaching from my hospital room these days though I  do get out to a few schools.

    For adults, chess is a tough way to make a living. But for the kids it is a nice way to earn a bit of money. One of my 8-year old students picked up $300 at a tournament last yearn and my 5-year old star pupil earned $70 earlier this summer!

  • 20 months ago

    JoseO

    With few exceptions, most players will not make a living with chess. This is probably why very few people pursue it since there is a lot of effort to be placed and no guarantee of a return.

    It would be nice if more people could make money from playing chess so that there would be more people involved but that does not appear to be something that is going to be happening any time soon.

  • 20 months ago

    madmanchessplayer

    Nice article. excellent information and an eye opener.

  • 20 months ago

    naughtybishop

    How much can you make at chess if you count playing or analyzing during work hours?  I might make more than some GM's per year with that sort of accounting.

  • 20 months ago

    millvillage

        Compared to Big Sports, the top chess players are not making that much.
    Still, $50k plus per year ain't bad.
         Since we are talking money, where did Kirsan Ilyumzhinov come up with the
    10 million clam$ for his now infamous offer in New York City?  Could you elaborate on how FIDE is funded?  Who controls the purse strings?  Can Kirsan decide on his own to spend that kind of money?
         As far as building a chess center somewhere, why not put it to a vote of the chess playing community?  This date, there are well over 2 million members just here on chess.com.
         There are many ways to fund a center outside of FIDE.  Small contributions from many individuals can really add up and that is just one method.  Or, look at it this way, chess.com could build it themselves (ourselves):  
    2 million members X $5 each = $10 million

    Sincere thanks for your work and articles.

  • 20 months ago

    WGM Natalia_Pogonina

    @ cyronix That's incorrect, Moro is a $ millionaire. His rant about quitting chess was related to wanting to try himself in something else, e.g. business, not complaining about not being to make a living from chess.

    @ bulletchess4fun Not necessarily. Besides, a person who really loves chess will never quit it for poker (unless he/she really has to).

    @gainpip True, that's why it says a list of LEGAL ways... :)

  • 20 months ago

    WGM Natalia_Pogonina

    @ DadInc The numbers are not consistend and not based on some calculations. It's just that the RCF made this decision.

    In Russia there are no rules regarding team composition (except that the national champion gets to play for the first team). A total mess, in fact. Therefore, sometimes all ones needs to play for the team is good personal relationships with particular people or influential lobbyists behind.

    @ misodle I don't think one can make a lot by writing columns. Books, if popular enough, stand for a larger income.

    @Graveworm Yes, unfortunately, most 2500+ players have either to work (at least part-time) as coaches, or quit.

  • 20 months ago

    billwall

    I just looked at the earnings of tennis players to compare.  Nadal, the top player has made $ 7 million to date.  Serena Williams has made $4 million to date.  There are 15 men who have made over $1 million this year.  There are 12 women that made $1 million this year.  The top 100 in men make $230,000 or more.  The top 100 in women make $160,000 or more.  This does not take in account money earned from advertisements, commercials, endorsements, etc.

    For golf, the top 100 make over $800,000 a year. 

Back to Top

Post your reply: